Lauren Lee

Feature by Julia Tolda

Photos by Amelia Fay
Production Assistants: Will Park and Mori Liu

Lauren Lee is a senior at Barnard, majoring in Visual Arts and Art History. She is a Scorpio sun, Leo moon, and Aquarius rising, originally from Malaysia. We meet at Cafe Amrita on a chilly fall afternoon. She orders hot chocolate, and we have a conversation about how she rarely drinks coffee. Stuck in her head is a line from Semi-Charmed Life by Third Eye Blind, that goes “When I'm with you, I feel like I could die and that would be all right.”

JULIA TOLDA: Why did you start photographing?

LAUREN LEE: I got into photography because I'm an introvert. At parties, I would be too nervous to talk to anyone, so sometimes I would bring my camera. And once you have a camera, you kind of blend into the background. You can deflect conversations by asking people if they want a photo. You take it and then disappear. A lot of my photography started out as this kind of “wallflower photography”. I like it when people pretend I'm not there—not invading—but rather capturing moments they'll want to remember or are important to remember.

Le Bain

Most of my work has to do with themes of being this weird, foreign body, occupying foreign space. When I first moved to New York, photography was a method of looking into this whole new culture. The photos I take here are not like anything at home in Malaysia.

JT: What is it that you like most about photography?

LL: I really like thinking on my feet. I enjoy being put into situations where I don't know what's going to happen. I love the thrill of unpredictability, and combined with the visual aspect of photography—making things look good and being able to capture them. Imprisoning a second into an image. And with film photography, it’s even more of a challenge. Once I fell in love with it, I really dedicated myself to becoming better. After years of pushing myself, photography had become a hobby, and then suddenly I had a portfolio!

JT: Is photography more than a hobby for you now? Where has photography been taking you?

LL: Photography is no longer a hobby, although it started as one. Having my work in galleries has made it more concrete, which is something I never thought would happen. If I had known this was something I could do, photography would have been a career option from day one. It’s nice to have a creative side! My experience with photography as an art has recently expanded to include painting and drawing.

JT: I’d love to hear more about your painting and your other visual artwork.

LL: My painting and drawings were really an accident. I had this phase last year, where I think life just caught up to me. I didn’t want to go to parties, all I wanted was to lock myself in my studio. One day, someone left this empty canvas that they had primed and gessoed and everything, just perfect. So, I was like “fuck it, let's play around”... And that was the most therapeutic thing that I'd done in years. I remember feeling so exhausted afterwards that I didn't even look at my work. I just went home and fell asleep for hours.

After that I slowly started to tap into painting and drawing, I wanted to make it intentional. I started going to the studio to play with color and also the idea of text.

I feel like my work is super child-like. Every time I do a painting or a drawing, I never plan it. I never know how it's going to be at first, but I will look at the work a week later and realize what was going on in my head—that I poured it all out into art.

JT: Tell me more about the role of text in your work.

LL: Photography made me view text as exclusively either found or created. In actuality, writing is so much more complicated than that. I started playing around with the boundaries between drawings and words.

A lot of the texts that I do relate to relationships, connection, and isolation. The words kind of just come out, sometimes inspired by songs or something else I’ve heard, but I don't plan my writing at all. It just happens.

JT: You touched on the idea of foreignness in your work, which many times can be considered quite political. Where do you draw the line between the personal and the political?

LL: Most of my work, I would argue, is very psychological, very internal. And I guess I mainly depict the female experience. There's a quote from a paper that I read that said “the process of becoming a woman is unremittingly grim.” You are not born a woman; you become one based on the environment that you're thrown into. My work is about my experiences, but it's not limited to me. I mean, being a woman is political, right? Nothing is too political

I do wonder about how other people perceive me and my work, though. Am I limited to that of a foreign being—an alien in your head? Or are you able to understand my work as universal? Oftentimes, when women look at my work they say, ‘This is super powerful, you managed to put these feelings I have onto paper. Men look at my work and I get a lot of ‘Oh, this looks like Basquiat,’ or 'This looks like Keith Haring.’...

JT: What are some of your inspirations?

LL: I like Rothko. I like sitting in front of that and dissociating. I used to be really into Basquiat before the super saturation, and the hyper-capitalization of his work… See, I hate saying I'm an artist as a woman and then not naming women as inspirations! There's a woman out there. I promise.

JT: Speaking of the female experience, how do you feel about the term “woman artist”?

LL: Have you read the paper Why there are no great women artists? Everyone's fucking read it at this school! The main point is that we have no great female artist because people didn't think women could do art. (And institutional obstacles, obviously.)

I hate the term woman artist. I am insanely tapped into how people perceive me, especially as an artist. When I hide my name from my work, I get different impressions on it. If the viewer knows I am a woman, that adds meaning to my work…

JT: Here is the million-dollar question. How do you want to be perceived?

LL: I want to be perceived as…[she pauses for a moment and trails off]. I guess as who I am. But that's tough because I don't really know who I am. I grew up in a totally different world: I was trained to know what the other person was thinking all the time and to cater to them. I always had to be a good reflection on my family or yourself and all that. I have this weird, twisted relationship with my perception of myself.

For now, I guess who I am is quiet, introspective, and kind. It's always hard being kind as a woman because then where do you draw the line of being stepped on?

I would say my art is bold, and I'm bold... I don't know. I would love to be perceived as this mysterious person who never comes out of her cave, and makes art [laughs]. I want to be that person, but we'll see.

Disco Boots

JT: How do you feel about social media? What do you want to show the world? What don’t you?

LL: Social media deeply terrifies me. I have this complex with Instagram where I hate posting pictures of myself. I kind of want to go total ghost. Maybe it's all my Scorpio placements… But it’s mainly something I just use to post my work now.

It's so scary to have your life on display in such a limited view for others to perceive. I took a long break from Instagram, and then I made the shift to mainly posting my work and not myself. I wondered if how others view me changes how they view my art. I don't even post most of my art because of how personal it is. If you notice, the text in my work is super small, like whispering secrets, almost.

Something about posting my work on social media seems like a challenge, especially works with text that reveal my feelings. I suppose that's the point of art: vulnerability, to create work that people can relate to. For now, I post just my main works or things I feel like the world should or needs to see. Hopefully once I graduate, I will go out with a bang and post whatever the fuck I want. My art doesn’t need to cater to other people’s feelings–I make art that should be seen! I need to claim that!


Find out more about her @laurenpohlee

Adela Schwartz

Feature by Sophia Ricaurte

Photos by Emily Lord
Production Assistants: Sungyoon Lim, Cas Sommer, Anushka Khetawat

Adela is a film photographer whose work spotlights meaning between subject and artist. Interested in what is earnest and vulnerable, she transforms personal perspective holistically. She is a first-year at Barnard from the Bay Area. 

It is a heavenly October Wednesday at noon when I get a call from Adela, saying that she has tested positive for Covid, that she’s taken rapids before but none with a T-line of such an unambiguous violet. We reschedule, easy, for fifteen minutes later except I nearly double the delay because my test runs of Zoom’s recording feature are giving me two dots and a mouth-slant—nonplussed at what, I don’t know. It’s 12:28 now. I better just send the link. 

Despite being ill, her spirits are high. Adela is so cheerful, it’s the only contagious thing buzzing through our laptops a few blocks apart. This, however, isn’t so much a shock given the style of her photography—with brazen compassion that, too, bursts through her work. Her photos of singular people don’t emphasize individual identities as much as they try to recognize something more constitutive and unprotected. 

When asked about her influences, she is shaped by the heartfelt: “That’s a hard question because I think I always go back to my family. My style for a long time was based on my brother, who is super cool. His stuff is really amazing. He picked up photography in a high school class and continues with it now. He taught me how to use a film camera—a little connection moment with my brother—and then I kind of went off on my own and started to develop my own style and dive deeper into the connection portion of portraits. In terms of thought processes within my work, I think about my dad and my mom. Something prevalent in my work is looking at things from a new perspective, which my dad has always encouraged. My mom is really curious, so that makes me look at the world in a different way too.” Her film photography is a rotation of the real. A wavering of the real, quite literally sometimes. 

6534

She hones her creativity outside of school, saying, “I didn’t really see myself as an artist until eighth grade because it was very much about copying things, and to me, it was like, why would I want to sit here and do that?” Following that year, she flourished into the artist label even more: “Going into high school, I went away to New York for a summer. I was fourteen, and it was for a photography class. That was when I got into portraits. That was the starting point.” 

Now, she mostly does film photography but she has worked in other mediums such as painting, drawing, woodworking, ceramics, and some graphic design. However, she says, “Classes weren’t really the way for me to produce stuff that I was proud of.” A first-year at Barnard, Adela mentions that she hasn’t had too much time to work on her art outside of courses, but, still, she says, “One thing that caught my eye from the roll of film I had developed here is finding places where nature disobeys the city environment or is stuck in between. I want to continue shooting around the city.” When asked about long term aspirations, she says her goals are to “just to keep doing it, developing my skills and connections with people and the environment around me over time.” 

I WILL BE

Some of Adela’s work plays on a 1:1 scale. She is interested in how people conceive of themselves insofar as her art can help bring more awareness and confidence to their self-image. Her work is a mode of caring. There’s a certainty in her art’s social effects because her subjects can be deeply involved. For one project, she says, “I interviewed people on what they felt insecure about. Then, we worked together to reframe it in a different light. There were five people involved in this project and two photos per person. One was a portrayal of the insecurity itself and the other was its reframing. For example, one person said ‘I feel insecure that I’m so thin,’ and so I asked, ‘Well, what's something that you like about your body?’ And he said, ‘Well my body works. It works for me.’ That’s where that shot came from.” The camera as mediation is more olive branch than it is distancing. Futuristic sites, abstract and physical, for unfamiliar and positive associations to sprout. 

WILL I EVER BE?

For another subject in this project, she says, “That’s my friend Naomi. She was insecure about scars and acne on her face. She had a bike accident earlier that year, and I said, ‘What does your face do for you in your life?’ She said, ‘Well, I can express myself through it.’ It’s more about personal stories than individual people.” Adela’s work espouses this shift in focus. It's a fresh concentration on the self. This photography feels like warm, buttered bread—salvaging, inviting, and needed. 

Adela adds, “Each photo, when I presented it, had a quote. So I would have a quote about the insecurity and a quote about the reframing. I left it in their words. I didn't want to add anything else because it wasn’t really my place.” Her photography carries a strong devotion to visibility and its power. These are careful acts of recognition, not just after an amalgamation of aesthetic choices, but also oriented towards a kind of therapy. Each photo is an outstretched humanity, an elastic taffy of intimacy. The work is interested in the true life of its subject as much as it is interested in artistry. Adela’s art is in medias res and refuses to neglect the before and the after. 

RIPPED APART

You can find more of her work at adelaschwartz.com!

Lolo Dederer

Feature by Phoebe Sarah Dittmore Klebahn

Photos by Norman Godinez

Lolo Dederer is a junior in Columbia College studying Architecture. She is a multimedia artist with a special interest in watercolor, acrylic paint and the use of found and gathered objects. Her work focuses on collecting emotions, moments, and physical items into cohesive images that inspire self reflection in their viewer.

When Lolo arrives at our meeting, her outfit is eclectic: paint-dotted jeans, several long layers of necklaces, and a green and white trucker hat. She greets me with a warm smile and immediately we get to talking about where to chat in order to avoid both the crowd in Joe’s Coffee and the rain.

We end up at the architecture studio where one of her classes meets. She tells me about her memories of creating. Her first artistic explorations centered around her mom who was  “always making stuff.” Lolo says that: “She’d make us little figurines and paper dollies and paper doctor’s kits.” Her mother had a studio at home, and on her and her sister’s birthdays, she would ask guests to bring homemade art pieces in lieu of more traditional gifts. One of the first pieces of art Lolo remembers creating is a paper full of little lines as a gift to her older sister Oona on her fourth birthday.

iwish

Lolo and her family save these pieces of artwork in binders. Although her mom was the first one who stored her art, Lolo is now the collector of the family. “I feel like I’ve always been a bit of a pack rat, and my family always makes fun of me for it. My mom would come to tuck me in for bed, and there would be rocks, maybe a pen, and other random stuff under my pillow.”

reliquary to an empty mind

Her current creative process draws on both her experience with collecting physical items and her desire to preserve memories and emotions. Over the pandemic, a friend encouraged Lolo to start journaling, a practice that allowed her to capture moments and feelings from her day-to-day life. Lolo’s journaling evolved into drawings in her notebooks as a meditation on transitory emotions and events. She uses journaling as a tool to “remember and attach myself to something that I have collected and is sitting in the back of my brain.” 

mon seul desire

This shift towards using her art as a form of emotional processing is fairly new. Up until a few years ago, Lolo’s art was more illustrative, a style which is still perceivable in her current portfolio. She states that her journaling “became a way to almost meditate on a feeling without putting words to it, which is something that we all can work on: not needing to always know how you feel. One of my friends always says ‘you don’t need to put a name to your feelings because not everything has a name.’ [Artmaking] is a nice way to just sit with things, and get away from obsessive journaling.” 

This meditative practice permeates Lolo’s current work. Her direct, spontaneous approach to drawing and painting can be easily seen in her figurative drawings. The piece “Egotistical Maniac” is a “portrait of self reflection” drawn after a run in Riverside Park. She recalls her process for the piece: “Sometimes you feel like your brain is all over the place. I had this really strange experience after running when I went home and said ‘okay I’m gonna draw myself.’ Sometimes when I do these drawings, I think about how egotistical it is for me to be sitting here drawing myself, thinking about myself.’ Trying to figure out the proper way to perceive yourself is kinda tricky.” This self-reflective tendency is echoed in Lolo’s choice of creative space, as she primarily likes to work alone in her room. She tells me that she prefers to create art in “a little cocoon to think and make.”

egotisticalmaniac

Over quarantine, she was able to hone the mixed-media and found object aspect of her work as her online architecture class encouraged her to build models with whatever she could find around her. This kick-started her recent foray into painting on found boxes and pieces of cardboard she picks up off the street. One of her paintings shows a single body, depicted in oil paint on a found cardboard canvas, with its head seemingly being torn apart into many different heads and faces. Lolo tells me she painted the piece after an argument with her mother.

Lolo is generous with her art and her creative process, hosting art making events for her friends in her dorm room. She and her roommate gather people together to create exquisite corpses—collective drawings where one person draws a tiny portion of a picture without being able to see what anyone else has drawn before them. She also volunteers with Artists Reaching Out, a club on campus through which artists teach art classes in elementary schools in the surrounding neighborhood.  

In teaching and sharing her art with others Lolo emphasizes going “a little crazy! I feel like taking the pressure off yourself in making art is important. Playing is important.” She strongly believes in the value of art—regardless of style, quality, or perceived “goodness.” “I’m a big proponent of whatever you make, as long as you are making things and you make enough of it, it's valuable.”

disturbingmemagenta

When asked about the future of her art practice, she answers that, “I hope to always have some kind of creative practice just for the sake of fun. I hope to be involved creatively, whether it’s creative directing, architecture, or at a design firm.” Lolo’s free spirit is palpable in her art work. It is impossible to witness without feeling a profound respect for both her and her artistic journey.

You can find more about Lolo and her work: @lolo.archdesign

Ashley Jiao

Feature by Claire Killian

Photos by Frances Cohen, Will Park

Ashley Jiao is a senior in Columbia College, studying visual arts and statistics. She reflects on the importance of process in her art making and how she has gotten to a place of growth and comfort in her artistic practice. 

Who inspired you or encouraged you to pursue art? 

In terms of artistic influences, I definitely have many that I've found through Instagram. I constantly look at new images every day, and artists that I follow on Instagram are definitely most of where I get that. I really like just looking at my wall which has art by Rae Klein. I've discovered this painter named Sarah Fripon, whose work I feel really connects with what I'm interested in right now. 

I also enjoy going to galleries seeing what the contemporary art scene is like. I'm definitely more inspired by contemporary artists rather than historical artists in museums because I'm interested in knowing what's going on right now. 

I'm also inspired by books and poetry. I think I get a lot of the ideas from images and phrases that stick out to me, that create a vivid image in my mind. For example, one of the books that I recently read that really influenced me is Dogs of Summer by Andrea Abreu. It talks not only about the sticky, disgusting side of adolescence and girlhood but a toxic adolescent relationship. The imagery mentioned in the book is really beautiful and striking to me as well. It made me think about animals and dirt and grime. Also religion and purity—a lot of different concepts. 

When I'm working I need to listen to music, especially playful and upbeat music. I also like when music is bad enough that it's good. It inspires me to be more playful and loose with my paintings. 

I would also say fashion and other forms of self expression also play into my work, especially with the color schemes that I'm into. I've noticed that I've recently been gravitating towards purples, grays, reds, pinks and blues, which correspond with the colors I like to dress in. 

Additionally, accessories and small trinkets inspire me. Because one thing I'm playing with now is scale, and I like to scale in on the small objects. I’m also toying with the concept of making decorative paintings that incorporate accessories in them.

You talked about your literary influences dealing with the stickiness of living and not shying away from the grossness and vulgarity of life, but then your musical influences are happy and playful. How do you reconcile these two things?

In a way my paintings are trying to find spaces with comfort, a happy mania within the grossness of everything. They might be two different sides of the same weirdness.

When someone, whether it's in a classroom or gallery, interacts with your painting, is there any particular thing that you want them to think about?

I feel like when I'm making my art, I don't really think too much about what other people might think of it. How they react is something I can't control; I'm just trying to externalize or give form to the ideas in my own head. And in that way, it sometimes feels very isolated—in a good way. I hope my art can bring the viewer comfort or some sort of resonance. 

But that's not something I can guarantee, obviously. That's not something I'm super worried about anymore. So I would say, in my paintings, I like to focus more on the form than content. For example, I don't start with an idea or a concept that I wanted to put on a painting, I don't want to be like, “oh, I'm gonna have a person here. and they're gonna be doing this.” The ideas start with a form in my head. I'll think of an image, and then I think about how I can display this image in a way that is interesting compositionally. And then I go from there, because the paintings are not making these big statements about any sort of content in particular. 

I read this piece by Susan Sontag about how assigning meanings to paintings is reductive, that explaining paintings alters the original intent of the artist. I resonate with that because even if I'm painting something about, let’s say, a plate of gummy candy, I don't really feel like that's what it's about. It's more so the image itself that really sticks in my mind and evokes a sensory reaction for me, rather than having to explain the ethics of gummy candy. 

Overall, I'm just making art as a form of self expression for myself, mostly just because it feels like very necessary to me to give permanence to the ideas in my head. I'm not as worried about how other people process my art, but it's really nice when people enjoy it and we have have sort of a shared language to talk about the art. 

Can you describe what your creative process is like?

It's changed over the years, but recently, I've been drawing from phrases that stick out to me. It doesn't even have to be from anything specific, or from my imagination. An image will come into my head, and I think about how I can make this image even more interesting. I write it down in my sketchbook. If I feel like it's compelling, and it's something I keep thinking about, I might put in the steps to make it into painting. I'll make a sketch, see what's the best composition.  I figure out how big I want the painting to be, then stretch my canvas. Afterwards, I will make an underpainting, and then keep working from there. 

I'm a pretty slow painter, and I'm also used to working very methodically. I like lists and step by step processes that keep me on track, because I feel like my mind is very meandering. If I don't make lists, nothing's gonna get done. 

How do you decide what sort of medium you want to use in a work?

I've moved into ceramics and sculpture more recently, but I’ve always been drawn to the tactility of three-dimensional objects; a lot of my work deals with, and appeals to, the senses, in a very childlike way. I like a nice three-dimensional surface that I can touch or something very tactile in the world. 

In the past, my three-dimensional work has been a little more conceptual. With my paintings, I start with an image in my head, and I know I want that image down, but with my ceramics and sculpture, I might be like, “oh, I want to explore modularity, or I want to explore something else.” For example, I made a house before that was out of ceramic. I was thinking about family history, the remembrance and forgetting of family history, and my childhood and adolescence. 

A lot of the time, my paintings and my three-dimensional work pair together; usually the same things inspire them. In general, it depends on if I think the three-dimensional spatial element will contribute to the work at all. But I really enjoy all these mediums.

How did you first get involved in art? 

I doodled for fun in school. I was obsessed with dogs; that was my thing. I would also doodle a cartoon duck on all my homework. I distinctly remember sixth grade: I was doing poorly in my art classes. I don't know why, but I find that funny now. I don't come from a family of artists or anything. However, my mom started sending me to an art studio where I learned traditional painting and the basics of oil painting which set a great foundation for my later work. I did art throughout high school, taking art classes and AP Art. 

Then for a while in college I felt like I moved away from art a little bit. I had not found the subjects that I was interested in; I knew how to paint realistically, but there wasn't one thing that was compelling. I wasn't compelled to make images in the same way that I am now, playing with composition and all these formal elements of the painting. Thankfully, I really found, or I have started to find, myself as an artist and the themes and the visual language that I want to work with. I feel like once you have a visual language that you want to work with, or you know resonates with you, it's a lot easier to generate images from there. 

I feel like I'm thinking about images all the time now. 

What is the most challenging thing about making art?

Recently, it's just been the slow pace that I work at. I'm just a pretty slow person in general. I think with the pace of life that we're used to in society, art making doesn't necessarily fit in.

I read this piece by Jeanette Winterson, and it was about art making and how when you make art as a job or to produce for a gallery, for any deadline, or for other people in general, it sets you at this pace that isn't natural for art making, because art making comes in waves. It's very natural to have to take breaks, to work at your own pace. 

I feel like because I tend to work at a slow pace, it doesn't always correlate with the pace that I'm expecting myself to be able to achieve, not because of outside influences, but just internally. Being patient with myself and getting comfortable with my own pace and being okay with having certain ideas and catching my work up to these ideas is something that's been challenging for me. 

Can you describe the headspace you are in when making art? 


Art for me, even though I work in lists and steps, is still so, so emotional for me. Honestly, in the past, every time I've talked about my paintings, I've cried because it's so deeply emotional to me; it’s a place that feels rooted in spirituality, and the metaphysical aspects of making a painting. 

My mom is a big influence, not only in my art, but also in my life. I've always kind of been told that there was a higher power, or something above us to believe in. When I’m painting, I'm in a spiritual, metaphysical realm. I view crying, and being emotional, as part of this. 

Art is deeply personal to me. It makes me feel like I am part of something, part of my highest self, maybe. It just feels right and necessary for me to be making images and painting. 

What’s next for you and your art?

I don't have anything planned right now, not for a show or anything like that. I'm really focused on making a new body of work right now. I've been working with gummy candies and making a series of paintings and some sculptures. 

I would say my work in the past was more figurative, representing the human figure itself, but I'm looking to move away from that.

The gallery space is so saturated with figurative work. It's just really exciting to take a break from that. Although I'm not completely shying away from it. I'm just finding myself more attracted to depicting objects and animals, and seeing what reactions those things can evoke. 

I'm really interested in iconography in the same way, for example, I think I'm really inspired by young, queer, tattoo artists on Instagram, and all the meanings that can be captured in a symbol. How we assign meaning to these symbols, and also how iconography can play into belief systems and religion and our associations with the world. 

My work recently has been me thinking about how we form labels and systems of meaning in the world and how we might be able to deconstruct this in a very adolescent way, where you're still in this very open, absorbing information phase, not making assumptions about anyone or anything. 

I've also been interested in scale and composition recently. Depicting small things really big, or having the subject take up the entire canvas, or an interesting section of the canvas is something that I play with. 

Also sensitivity to sensory stimuli. Which is something that maybe ties into adolescence too, because I think that part of being a child is liking to play with things and looking for gummy candy. 

And okay, maybe this is embarrassing, but I've been really into slime videos and ASMR. Overall, I think I'm just very attuned to my senses right now, so maybe that's coming out in the work a little bit.

It's taken a while for me to find myself as an artist, or at least get to the stage where I feel such a pronounced love for this process of thinking of and creating images. If I could talk to myself a year ago, I would just basically say, “be patient with yourself,” in terms of finding a visual language. 

Feeling inspired all the time is definitely not something that always happens, but it does come through making and creating more, learning from other artists, consuming as many images as you can and just noticing what interests you in the world—it doesn't have to be anything big. 

I feel like making art is very affirming to me. It feels necessary for how my brain works, because a lot of the time I feel like my self expression is blocked through verbal expression. This is the truest way for me to express my deepest self to other people—the permanence of paintings and art acts as a documentation for me because I am a very forgetful person. It is nice to have a record of what I was interested in at that time and be able to visually map my change and growth. 

Art for me is just so sacred and unexplainable. 

You can find more of Ashley’s work on instagram @leg____pageant

Joan Tate

Feature by Anna Lugard

Photos by Maria Shaughnessy

Editors note: the original piece published about Joan was a mistakenly uploaded snippet of her feature, and not the final version. Below is the updated and completed feature.

Joan Alice Tate is a Senior in CC studying creative writing with a focus in poetry. Joan’s work draws from her experiences growing up southern, spiritual, and closeted. She is interested in the body and mind as a locus for change, development, evolution, annihilation, and hope. She will be attending UMass Amherst’s MFA Program this upcoming fall. 

Joan Alice Tate exudes an easy confidence and an air of calm. She strides up to me without a hint of the typical harried Columbia speed-walk. We are meeting in Riverside park, Joan’s preferred creative space, on what feels like the first day of spring in the city. Joan tells me she has just arrived from a meditation class and is feeling at peace. We sit down at a bench overlooking the water to discuss her poetry and creative process. 

Joan was raised across the state of Virginia, moving from the North to the coast, and eventually settling in Appalachia, just outside the town of Roanoke. She grew up in a uniquely religious environment: her father is a fifth-generation minister in the United Methodist Church, and many of her other family members are also ordained. Joan’s religious background is an ever-present theme and inspiration in her poetry. However, her spirituality has expanded widely beyond its Southern Protestant origins. Joan describes her spiritual beliefs as “an amalgamation of Buddhism, Protestantism, Christianity… Catholicism, and Taoism.” She takes inspiration from Catholic mysticism and Jewish intellectualism, citing Simone Weil, Walter Benjamin, and Franz Kafka as some of her creative influences. She is currently finding the most stability in Buddhism, and regularly practices sutras and meditation. 

Joan enjoyed an exceptionally literary upbringing. She grew up going to sermons every Sunday, which first kindled her interest in creative writing: “I loved listening to people talk, and the poetry of the bible. I became obsessed with words.” As a child, she was “a voracious reader” and wrote short stories in her free time. In middle school, she began experimenting with spoken word poetry, a phase she is grateful for - “it got my bad poems out really early.” By the time she was applying for college, Joan knew she wanted to become a writer. 

Joan’s journey from Virginia to New York was “a flight - that turned into an embrace of something new.” She describes her time at Columbia as divisible into two phases, separated by her gender transition halfway through college. As a freshman, she felt “angsty, frustrated, chaotic, and unsure about how to get to a point,” sentiments that came through in her creative work. Post-transition, she drifted away from Columbia and began investing in close relationships and immersing herself in city life. Her writing reflects this evolution: “Poetry was one of the ways that I processed my transition… it became more explorative about what it means to be a woman in general.” 

Dykin’ it 

I used to beat the shit out of my guy friends in high school
on the pavement or in the puce government carpet
behind a wall of backs we’d tuck away and
I never let go of a wifebeater, a crew cut. I dug in for the crowd
and stomped guts so hard Paul puked
sprinkler style all over his crisp ROT-C fatigues, laughing with the devil.
We all were full of passions. Mine was love.
All those men, now mechanics, section 8’s, cops,
pushers, and marines. To say I’ve stepped off that boat
isn’t wrong but it’s certainly misguided.
I never tried to be one of the boys,
I was just dykin’ it.
I was helping men see stars
the only way I knew how

Moving to New York played a crucial role in Joan’s creative expansion. She characterizes the South as a “gorgeous but very fraught place.” As someone who “grew up very strangely, gender-wise,”, Joan experienced “an odd discomfort of knowing and overhearing things you are supposed to overhear, about how you are meant to conform.” After moving to the city, she felt a new sense of freedom. Joan describes New York as a major creative influence: “I’ve tried to embrace the city as much as I can… being able to step out and see the city, to be myself and finally feel like my self is really wonderful––I think that is where a lot of the joy and brilliance in so much of my recent work has come from.” Joan is a “big fan” of the New York school of poets, including Frank O’Hara, “one of the central pillars” of her poetry. Joan also takes inspiration from Eileen Myles and Alice Notley, to whom she owes her middle name. Joan sees the quiet moments in the city as “at the core of the beauty that these poets capture.” However, she concedes that the best part about New York is that “you see so much insane shit - that inspires you, or makes you sad - there is so much in the city that has informed my practice. New York has really become my home.” 

Two Grief Portraits 

A. Still Life of Dead Hares
Our warrens have
run empty. My haunches tense
and moan awaiting
the bang of a gun


the shot of a redtail
from across the field.
The folded ears you water,
the clovered eyes


leaned on for years
look in from the threshold
before they sprout with iron.
I am waiting.


In the dark I am
waiting for the rest,
those dolls from up before
the strait-hatch opens...


B. Self-Portrait with Cropped Hair
... and the deed is done. The door locks and the chair
sits softly, creaks
just before my seat hits the wood. A softened hand chokes the shears.
A group of ghosts is called an influence.


A group of hares is called a braid.
As if excess might be substitute for identity, long before
staring blindly out at passing songs, the slits of rain that open
with the AC hum and


a buzzing in the ear like how Grief manifests,
usually as a ring of keys in your pocket
leading you through a spine of doors.
A group of sinners is called a party.


A group of sticks is called a faggot.
Still, at night the sky remains lovely where'er we walk
(even if it is still not open for us) I worry about my eternal soul
falling down the stairs like a broken stone, or a burning chifforobe, like the light that leaves the stars for here


and can only call back
After Goya and Kahlo

Joan’s work is also influenced by her background in classical Latin. She has studied Latin since middle school and even considered minoring in it at Columbia. Joan describes herself as “a geek for Tacitus” and enjoys reading the poetry of Catullus, Horace, Ovid, and Virgil in their original Latin form. As someone who “tries to figure out what embodiment looks like through poetry” she appreciates how “in so much of Latin literature, the text itself becomes this living,

breathing thing.” Joan imbues the intellectualism of classical academia with a distinctly current mutability. She is inspired by Latin literature’s openness to interpretation: “In these poems, you have to choose a route you go with, in terms of how you are going to read this.” She attempts to emulate this multiplicity of meaning in her own writing: “I incorporate a lot of punning, and ambiguous strange descriptions that can be interpreted in many different ways. I try to give the reader many avenues to flow down so that you can come to a different conclusion depending on your mood.” 

Joan describes her aesthetic voice as maximalist: “I like taking a poem or prompt and expanding it out into a lush, thick landscape. I want the reader to read the poem and embody its mental state, whether it is energetic, more sluggish and meditative, or insane madcap wacky bullshit. I want to create a playful space.” She has always found creative inspiration in the body, but her relationship to this subject has developed alongside her transition. “My poetry used to be entirely located within the body, and was viciously trying to get out of the body. As I transitioned, I was able to look outwards more. My poetry has expanded along with my own opening up.” 

Psychopomp (2021) 

... and in came Mrs. Swithin carrying a hammer.” - Virginia Woolf, Between the Acts


My elbow disconnects right at the socket
in most of my dreams of the Escort,for I won’t go.


And there’s a fabric flexing over the mouth,
your gentle brace of lights, that bullish notch we breathe from,


all vanish, clean behind the rag while feversweats soak in.
The snapping of the limb becomes a sonic rag of grit


teeth rubbing up against the sulphur binding to release,
to say the words oh kidnap(!), Carrion, cuc-kooo-Koo-kooo.


And I am just filled with Ordinations.
Just as the eyelid bats itself within its borders


I am racked within my spongey cell of revelation,
archedback praise, tensions unprescribed, the eye unglazed, takes in


an Ordination form from where that grounded sleep was torn
and led behind the heaving of the crows
or the lowing of the bull.


And now her dull-clack teeth are shaking you awake in time,
like the shiver of a blade upon my shoulder,


like our checkered kite, hanging in the gloam,
like my fingers, wrapped round some slipp’ry feature,


like the crick of an axe on pavement, they will say
she peeled that fucking jaw til both hands bled

Joan’s poem “Tetrapharmakos” reflects her evolving, fluid understanding of God. She now sees God “much more as some sort of working within the universe, a joy that bubbles up from within the cracks.” In her writing, Joan variously genders God as feminine and masculine. Her poetry and spirituality are “constantly in flux,” as is her gender presentation: “I try to be gender non-conforming. I enjoy being masculine sometimes, but I enjoy being a masculine woman… being a butch woman means being an expression of strength, an expression of confidence, an expression of love.” 

Tetrapharmakos 

After Arthur Russell


I’ve got a crush or two,
a brace of figures on bikes.
Persuade me and I’ll take the leap. Give me motivation
to kiss my bright God or the other one.
A barbwire pocket chain, a point of reference,
that’s what I need.
Because I would like to look sharp like Death,
with his sockets and blisters. Who knew bone could blister?
Who knew bone could be that hot?
I’d love to lay by and pop them with sick and red.
Who knew I could be so frustrated by it. God of course
wasn’t a fan, but when has she sought, where has she been
all these years


I was waiting for her, with my top off and fainting, the engine running,
lusting itself and me, sipping exhaust
in the absence of motherhood and fanning without. Crude everywhere! The bass
strings she uses to keep her time were tweaked
out and rusted. They call God “Mama Sunbleach” where I’m from.
She kept a whammy pedal inbetween her eyes and
wiggled it with her will or angels. Oh God, what a pain,
what a disconnect. Meditation doesn’t work anymore,
I’ll try smoking cigarettes rolled up in painters tape.


The tether is cut with longing and
whiskers fly ou—
Bring out the bone-man! Stripped because
it can be so hot so often. Burn him in his cloak, like an effigy, or a spectacle.
What a scythe! But what does it add up to in some grand scheme or
under its wave and brokers. Where’s the food,
where’s the tents, the barrels, where are the gums who reject her rope
or his teeth? We were by the rail, winding over bridges, no keys,
when they sailed by, handinhand and I choked on steam to see them.
They mocked me over the rushes
mocked me saying


that which is terrible
is easy to endure

Recently, Joan has been working on a series of sonnets, a form she first experimented with in her freshman year of college: “I used to go to parties, drink a ton and sit in the corner writing the worst sonnets in the world.” Since then, she has mastered the art of the evocative sonnet; her poem “Femmin’ It” is a complex, tender expression of love for her partner. “Pulling from the well of joy and happiness that has come from being able to look at my body after hormones and feel really ok with that - and feel really ok with that with someone else - that has really been one of the great joys of my writing.” 

Femmin’ It 

She found her dog in a ditch in Ohio. Gambel like oak,
cutest mutt around with a whine like a teeny tugboat,
the face of a quail, grimey little ratdog, cutie-little-pie,
her Familiar, jealous he watches me writhing in my bubble and
you draw me out mouthful by mouthful, scoop by scoop,
emptiness becomes the prajna shown to me through
holding your convulsive sleeps, the stumbles through your hair I
mumble things you're always saying, i blub you, gly glub glu,
Chelsea Girl, my dame of renaissance passions
all parts are good parts with you Aspen,
your smell like cologne and salt, your poet’s eyes, I’m
speechless in throes when you call the quiet names, you are strong,
blemished, and brilliant súch thát you shine, long
tongued beauty, my animal contortion, marvelous ebullient
fever to my soul, my stunning Aspen hooked up to my roots,
when you stop to stare at me the world just happens to grow

Joan probes the supernatural in her poem “Nobody in my life has ever told me how ghosts are made and now I really need to know.” Ghosts are a common feature in her poetry: “I’m really interested in the transitory space. Ghosts, as a construct, introduce the liminality of being between worlds, see through yet tangible.” Joan finds that the supernatural has the power to defamiliarize, to “break you out of your everyday life.” In general, Joan hopes to write poetry that will jolt the reader out of their ordinary existence - or rather, jolt them into a deeper understanding of the ordinary. “You read a poem, and suddenly a tree is not a tree, a tree is a reminder of someone who has left you, or life, or growth, or death. Poetry is a means of expanding language, and as a result, expanding experience. We are in a society that is so saturated with language that when a word means more than it used to mean, your entire world has expanded.” 

“Nobody in my life has ever told me how ghosts are made and now I really need to know” 

I just assume there’s this
iron lungmachine, god uses when he’s sad or heavy, just a
squnch of the torso and out of his breath and beard coughs proto-plasmic goo.
Yes. Of course. A phlegm of god,
a reliquary slime I’ll file away in jars and beakers and bathtubs.
It's green and biley. It rumbles when we touch it. Its bubbles smell sweet.
I send it flowing through our pipes to hear its bright rustle,
wandering the walls, see
the subtle irradiated gleam as it makes its way
into our bathtubs, our sinks, the granite washbasins
we keep hanging by our beds. If you dip a feather or a thread in enough
and wait a week's time,
by jove you’ve got a ghost.


Wait no. That couldn't. My senses tell me
the ghostskin is knit softly between needles. Or, more likely,
pulled from the backs of the shyest spiders, yes, spindly fellows
dim and with drooping eyes, but helpful, vocationally inclined
to form it tender
into a net, deep in the dark where it might be private
or in the ground where it might be empty or holy
so that the web might stitch together
so taut the spirits can
push their rounded heads upon the center, have made just for them a fine white sheet,
a doily, hanging with loose tendrils and flying silver threads by the breezes blown
and a million little eyeholes who turn crimson with sunlight
like freshly pulled glass.

Or I could be wrong again, terribly mistaken so this protoplasmic
fibre which is spider-guided is instead
a red herring. Is instead, only attracted to
the loose lint who bounces in your ears and pockets. who fills the bellies
of stuffed bears, mother geese. The squishy blue iguana’s beads
belong in ghost guts.
And so does mother’s roughspun Sally, my hawkish doll, with
her red dress, her orange chords and bow letting
faint smacks waver through my wet skin. my cold clothes.
and her bright eyes lodged ahead
to ring some darkened comfort from when mother set her down between
my palms. The fetish I squeezed through the brilliant door
to protect me in the street and barren attic. She
stirs in trembling fingers, holds vigil as the ghosts rush madly like trucks or moths
barreling into my light

Joan hopes to publish a manuscript after she completes her graduate degree. She is considering returning to New York to teach but may decide to pursue her spiritual path instead and join a Buddhist monastery. When asked about her idea of perfect happiness, Joan shares that she would love to live in a lighthouse with her girlfriends and write poetry. For now, she will be living in Massachusetts attending UMass Amherst’s MFA Program for Poets & Writers. You can find more of Joan’s work in 4x4 magazine and Quarto magazine. 

RGB Prosthetic: Session 3

FOCUS ON WHAT HASN’T BEEN FORGOTTEN.
START. Heat. Yes. There was a thickness in the skin. No,
too anaphylactic
. A hole in the backmolar? Not quite yet. A hot
thread of iron. a needle held in a pilot light. More. The
flashlight shining behind the eyelid or the sun poking
through chemical plants? Exhaust. Evening like beginning.
When? Evening without time. I said when? The tip of her
stained cigarettes. Before that. A sun settling into the
horizon. so it sears the cows bloody. for weeks it’s just
sitting there. Right. Red Feathers. You were working your
apple with a knife so its peels curled into the cream
colored bowl. Lipstick. She licked her knife and yours. She
had grey fuzz on her top lip
. Bucket after bucket full of rouged
skin you chewed like tickertape. Both your fingers ran raw
with callouses and brambleblood. Blackberry blood. The
stain where a face clipped the ledge below. Not yet. The
furrowed brow of a turkeyhen. After. The summer the dogs
went loose. the sun called you names from across the
garden. afterimages hung like sores. Summer leaves
reddened. they turned into dry smoke. Chiminea. Hellmouth.
Armchair
. Furious gashes appeared on pink portraits. the
cross shattered. Shame. The paperback by the bed? or the
kitchen ashtray? The Ashtray. A wheelbarrow full of
feathers. More. A clean cat. a cut tip. Are we off track? A set
of red heels. Click. A new scab. a sun torn. Click. You
looked for kindling. slept in leafbeds. Spark. looked out at
the sky trembling because, the moon fizzed like a dry matchhead
CALIBRATION COMPLETE.RUNNING
SUBALTERN ANALYSIS. The retaining walls were hewn
apart by kudzu. the kudzu licked the bricks like flame.
What? An olive hoodie with “FUCK WOLF MAN” on the
back. was that here? The vines she whispers she loves under
the tide. over the yelling and her split green door she
smiles. brown door. A horde of funny needles prickled
against your new feet. i was breathing buckets of tulips. Light
through the mist of cut grass. i was so small. A lop of
hedgeflesh on the dusty road. the faint blip of fireflies
cutting gloam like a screwdriver. Beer Bottles. mason jars. The
house never stood right. the fields behind were like paintings of
Railcars
. There's that butterknife you stowed under your
pillow. from what? The lights had gone out. a lack of lips.
Thick green smoke rooted through the chairs and the barn
doors. the goat cried like a man. There was a bird in the dark I

think. a bat. The flick of crisp heatlightning overhead as you
arrived. flight. silence. was that shame? The skim of energy
flooding across a field. in waves. You left the car and
prickled with ozone. you wriggled like the chrysalis you
stowed in the boarded chimney of the barn. I'd forgotten.
You covered it with a seafoam tarp. A crutch. An iron lung.
A chance. No one’s redemption. You found its wings half a
year later, that stale cornrow green. They snapped dry like
wafers.
You couldn’t stop touching them. It wasn’t my fault.
The sound of spry greenwood bubbling in the flames.
CHECK COMPLETE. RUN. Do you like the way that
sounds? I d-The way I can temper? I never cooled. Do you
feel it? Y-The way the prosthetic reads and refracts you?
Like here. in her garden. You remember your uncle had a
macaw. Yes. Unmarried. You’ve only seen pictures of him
petting the thing. Maybe. Its wings were azure, sparkling the
same color of painter’s tape. Blue Shoes. like a set of lips. I
never saw it.
The bird opened like a marlin behind the
screendoor. only in photos. Like light that plummets through
stained glass. He couldn't name it. It would make this sound.
Erin. Erin. Again and again his name he lives with his
mother, 80, and his father before he died she’s been hiding
her easter eggs in the nightgristle in the bluegrass remember
the bruises she gave your mother for prom night the
butterflies she caught you with a slap of palms. I killed it
didn't I? Lepidops. Pasture Sky. Sheets of water flapping in the
thunder.
Where? I doubt it ever rained. A new pack of bicycle
cards was always strewn across the floor his cobalt guitar
leaned on the mantlepiece. The first time I saw the ocean I thought I'd
never shut my eyes.
Back. That isn't here. It is the heat of
Summer in haunted pastures the macaw escaped bloodhaunted
and caterwalling as
it flew through the slanted house calling for
him
its falconer father keeper friend your grandma fried
chicken in her 12 inch pan and said it sailed “clean into the
skillet
.” dead as a doornail it started raw as if it wanted to burn
but she crisped it up and blistered her fingertips pinching
at the the lost feathers the pilot light a Blue Feather She put
meat to work. Of course. Cooked a plate of parrot for supper
and sat on the porch waiting for the faggot to arrive. He
was always always late. never wanted to talk.
She laughed pink
and blue when he arrived. Wait. He dropped the plate. I
know. I’m do
-Kicked off his cowshit work boots. chipped the
skirting board. plucked a flame from off the stovetop
. He sat there
s-Boiling into the porchlight. Easing into Lunacy: our rawest kind of
violence. Heaving so hard the grief had pickled his lungs to fat blue blots of smoke

Kate Miller

Feature by William Lyman

Photos by Rommel Nunez

Kate is a junior in CC majoring in Art History. She is a photographer and collage artist, heavily influenced by 20th century feminist photographers, vintage media portrayals of gender, and creating art from absurdity.

I’m late to Max Caffe, where, apparently, the vibes are “so good.” I send a precautionary text to Kate, who assures me that she’s enjoying the ambiance and doing some reading. I’ve known her for a year or so, and in that time I’ve recognized her as a character of casual coolness––stumbling upon a trendy brunch spot in the Lower East Side or going to cafes to do some leisure reading. She helped me arrange my apartment last summer and got us free drinks one strange night at Cowboy Jack’s. When I finally arrive, she’s stirring a half-full latte, dressed in a black blazer and pearl necklace. We briefly discuss our days, the weather, and 35 millimeter photography. I order an iced tea––which seems to annoy the barista––while Kate catches me up on what she’s been consuming lately: Circe by Madeline Miller, Phoebe Waller-Bridge in Fleabag, and Neftlix’s The Crown. “I know there’s a little shame in that,” she explains, “but when you take the Royal family and put pretty actors in their place, how could you not feel a little obsessed with the glamor of it?”

In fifth grade, Kate was convinced that she would be a fashion designer. “I carried around a little notebook all the time where I drew all my designs. I would compete with this other girl in my class. She was a much better illustrator than I was,” Kate tells me. The story serves as her first memories of herself as a creative, someone who had the desire to attach herself to art. “I always wanted a creative outlet,” she explains, “but I think I needed some instruction. I needed some pushes.” In her younger years, Kate excelled at math and science. She tells me that “the narrative was that I should do those things just because I could” and as a result, “art definitely fell to the wayside.” This path led her to studying applied physics for her first two years at Columbia, which she ultimately left to instead pursue Art History. She pauses and says: “I certainly do not consider myself a scientist these days.” 

It wasn’t until her sophomore year, in the early days of the Covid pandemic, that she found what she loved to do––collage. Like us all, Kate was left with lots of free time on her hands. She explains: “I'd been making art for so long, and really everyone who makes art is an artist. Sometimes it feels like a title that someone else bestows upon you, but I didn’t really have time to wait for that.” Living in the city, there was essentially nothing to do––“we couldn’t really go anywhere or do anything on a Friday night,” she explains. Kate talks fondly of nights at the Mexican Deli on 104th Street––eating tacos, grilled cheeses, fries, and Angry Orchard Rosé while collaging with her roommate. “Such a specific drink for such a specific time,” she says nostalgically. On these nights, Kate realized her love for the art form, of combining elements on the page. On collage, Kate says: “that’s where I started taking it seriously.” 

Kate began to collage using vintage magazines, original film photography, and materials she gathers during her daily life. “Texture is something that draws me,” she explains, as it is a representation of repurposing different elements. Kate continues: “Relation. Juxtaposition. Putting things together that aren't supposed to be together. I love that. That’s what draws me to art––the relationships between elements of the work and feeling unsettled by the things that have been put together.” 

When consuming art, Kate is “always drawn to work where you can understand what went on behind the scenes, where you can feel their hands in the work.” When I ask about her relationship to the world of digital collage, Kate pauses. “It feels like there's something missing for me,” she says, “there's this flatness that I don't like.” Kate appreciates art “as an escape,” and asserts that when she creates, she simply doesn’t want to look at another screen. She explains: “I do think some of my distaste for digital collage comes from that exhaustion of being on my phone, always consuming digital media.” 

Footage Fetish is a combination of film, sheet music, and exaggerated body parts. At Mother of Junk in Williamsburg, the place she credits for a lot of her discoveries, Kate stumbled across an antique dollhouse. She shot the house on 35 millimeter film, then combined it with another set of photos––a halloween wig sitting on a makeup mirror––to create the illusion of people in a living room. “My other projects have been a lot more drawn out and conceptualized,” she explains, “but with this one, I picked up two magazines and sat down, thinking: ‘I need to make something right now.’ It was a frenzy, a 45 minute cutting and gluing moment.” When asked what she hopes people will take away from the piece, she explains that: “I want people to interact with and engage with these works, but I don't need them to feel the same way I do about it.” It’s one of the things she loves about art––that “there is no right answer.”

In discussing her other influences, Kate seems to arrive at something essential about her work––highlighting the absurdity of cultural messages directed to women. Specifically, how these ideas have evolved through time. Kate discusses the trope of the “femme fatal” and its roots in Greek and Roman mythology––“Medusa, Circe, and other female characters who pose these mortal threats to men.” Kate traces this portrayal to film tropes, beauty advertisements, and media representations throughout the 20th century and into modern day. “The love of my life is Laurie Simmons,” Kate gushes. Simmons rose to prominence in the mid-1970s, critiquing women’s role in the domestic sphere through the use of doll parts, ventriloquist dummies, and toys. Kate cites Laurie’s series on the Stettheimer Dollhouse as a major influence on her work.

“The absurdity of these magazines speaks to me because there's so much content being created today. I'm interested in analyzing these old forms of media as a root of a lot of the problems in our society today, the way they've developed and progressed,” Kate explains. In examining these mid-century magazines, Kate is conscious of the fact that “so much of it feels like satire now,” but traces this back to the small breadth of information available. “People were solely consuming these magazines,” she begins, “just completely in the dark from all the other information and perspectives that were out there. They’re like a Bible in many ways.” 

The absurdism in beauty advertisements and cultural messaging is “super different today, because it's much more self aware,” Kate continues, “they're the same, but just coded.” I ask her about the vintage craze, about the age-old question of trendy thrifting––the buzz-words “curated vintage”––and she laughs. To me, there seems to be a great deal of absurdity in that concept, too––the anti-influencer who encourages the masses to search for character––how the past few years have seen a rise in uniqueness as a trend. “Of course, there's no freedom from these industries. You are always in the product, whether you choose to buy into it or not. We're always being influenced. The question is how you respond to it.” Kate poses an important question: “If you’re an amalgamation of the things that you've absorbed––is that not an identity?”

“During the summer going into sophomore year,” she begins, “a friend of mine from London came to visit and we had this really cool fun week in New York. We went to Chelsea market and I found this gold, embossed leather notebook.” She speaks hypothetically about this first journal, pulling a different book from her tote bag, opening it to reveal pages of collage and handwritten reflections. Her cursive intimidates me. “I started writing and I never stopped. That was four journals ago” she says. Kate takes me on a tour of her current journal, which is filled with scraps of paper, ink from brightly-colored pens, and film photos. Kate explains how the journal is home to many of her collage elements––film she had accidentally bought, a chapter-long meditation on Sappho, random song lyrics she connects to, or phrases she came across and wanted to remember. The journal even includes her Footage Fetish collage we had just finished discussing. It becomes clear to me that her journals are the centers of her creativity––where she collects and meditates on everything going on around her.

“It's so much fun. I love collecting things. I love looking back at them,” Kate tells me. She pulls out her phone and scrolls through her camera roll, looking for something. “My grandfather died recently, and we were cleaning out his house,” she explains, “my grandparents never cleaned out their closets and so there's so much crazy stuff.” Kate finds what she had been looking for, turning the screen to reveal a picture of a brown restaurant napkin. On it, written in blue ink, was: 

Flesh and corruption were the same from the very beginning, and always will remain the scum of creation, the very opposite of God's wisdom, mercy and splendor . . . Man would manage somehow to crawl upon the surface of the earth, forward and backward, until God's covenant with him ended and man's name in the book of life was erased forever.”

It was a quote from The Death of Methuselah, a short story collection about Jewish folklore and legend. Kate smiles: “that was just written on a napkin, saved in the closet for years. It's one of my favorite things that I've ever held.” 

Returning to her journals, Kate levels with me. She says: “I'm opening this up and it's also all of my deepest, dark secrets. I would never say them to anyone out loud.” Kate continues: “The purpose of writing is not to have it read, but to get it out. I find a lot of clarity in writing. I don't write anything particularly creative. I really just write about my life. It's about leaving a record of a past,” she tells me. I prod Kate for further information on the journals. She explains: “they were the main thing I created for a really long time, and it was the only place I felt like I could create. In my will, the journals need to be burned. I think it's important to have that place that you trust too much. I think that there has to be a space where there's no restrictions. There's no limitations on what you can say or do.” 

Holding this fourth journal, that I learned she got on a January 2020 trip to Peru, I come to understand a lot about Kate––how she is actively working to make her life a work of art. She collects ticket stubs, ominous blue-inked napkins, expired film, cut up magazines, reflections on her life experiences––she is in the business of building a rich record of her life. Her journals are the original form of collage, as they are responsible for taking her experiences with friends, the city, literature, influence, and cultural messaging and turning it into a representation of her identity. “I'm just a girl who's consuming everything else around me and putting it together, maybe cherry picking content, ideas, and visual concepts that speak to me. That is a part of who I am.” It is how she deals with the absurdity of modern existence––recognizing her identity as a form of collage, of something accumulated through her experiences. 

Find Kate @kkatemiller on Instagram.

Taylor Bluestine

Feature by Sophie Paquette

Photos by Jane Mok

Brooklyn-native Taylor Bluestine’s paintings, drawings, sculptures, and AI-generated images embrace surreality and chance. Materially motivated, Taylor plays with texture and touch until she finds her desired shapes, the strange forms which lend her work its precious delicacy. As she closes out her senior year at Barnard, Taylor boasts an impressive body of work operating across modes and scales, and her experimentation has only just begun. 

Sophie:

A lot of your work pairs the domestic--frames, houses, bedrooms, chairs--with the dreamlike. How do these spaces interact in your art?

Taylor:

It's been a progression. Originally, I was doing this series that was very indexical. I started by making still lives and then deconstructing them, adding weird details and moments of color. It was like a painted collage. Some objects were domestic, some were natural. I would paint them pretty realistically and then construct backgrounds behind the images so it looked like they were cut from a piece of paper and collaged on the canvas, when in reality, it was one painting done cohesively. That was done using a lot of domestic materials.

Eventually, I got frustrated with that because I felt like everything was too fragmented, and I wanted to work on making whole compositions. That's where some of these more dreamlike works have come about, from that desire to not cut everything up and put it back together. Instead, I'm interested in how I can make something familiar, strange, and unique without having to disfigure it.

Sophie:

What you're saying about the implicit process of the painted collage reminds me of these hidden messages in your paper pulp. Could you talk more about making the paper pulp for the frames?

Taylor:

That's a medium that I really, really, really love. I've had an adventure with it. As an artist, if you work with a medium for a long time, you come to an intimate understanding of it. This is like four years of my practice coming to fruition.

I went to an arts-focused high school, and looking back, the projects were really sophisticated. We had a project doing embroidery, which you can see in my work now. We had projects where we had to create things from scratch, using cardboard, everything. We also had multiple projects with papier-mâché. That really influenced my approach to work and always wanting to dip my toes in new mediums.

When I started working with papier-mâché, I was like oh, cool, I wanna make some sort of sculptural thing. It was really frustrating at first. Nothing that I was doing came out right. They looked kind of like a kid's papier-mâché sculpture, very angular, which can be a cool and interesting look, but it wasn't getting to the level of sophistication that I wanted. So I also tried using plaster, but that failed horribly because the sculpture completely broke because it wasn’t sturdy enough. 

I'd had this idea of using paper pulp on my radar for a while, but I was really intimidated by the process. One day I was like, you know what, I don't really understand how to do this, I don't really know what I'm doing, but I'm just gonna try because it can't be that hard. A lot of it was out of coincidence. My parents have a huge shredder in their room and they're always shredding documents. Every single bill they get in the mail, they shred. So I had this infinite supply of shredded paper that wasn't being used. I wasn't even thinking about the conceptual aspect, that came in later, but originally it was a material that was easily accessible. I started working with it, and I really fell in love with the materiality of it, and the way the inks on the paper dye the pulp when it's created.

Sophie:

It’s so interesting that the shredder comes from your parents' bedroom. Again, the work all feels very domestic. When did the paper pulp transition from just a material interest to a conceptual one? Do you consider the content of the pulp when you're making it, or do you rely more on play and chance?

Taylor:

I didn't realize the significance of it until I showed some of the work for the first time. I got a response from all these people being like, you're subverting use-value, et cetera. This is paper that has words on it, that's meant to communicate. And now it can't communicate anything. People wanted to know the process and the context, like where was I getting this from? What is it? It wasn't something that I had thought about because it was kind of obvious to me.

I love that the medium is super personal in that way. Every single batch you make is going to be different, and you don't really know what's in there. By nature, it's sensitive material, since it's shredded. So I don't really think too explicitly about the content. I am just happily surprised when I get some interesting papers that are in there and I get a really cool pulp. The one for that zigzag frame had blue credit cards in it, so it has this blue neppiness. What I'm working on now is a lot of shredded checks, which have this yellowy and speckled quality. So for the conceptual aspect, I really love that it has all these secrets, but I think it's almost more alluring that I don't know exactly what's in there. I'm arriving to it after it's already shredded.

Sophie:

When you show the frames, do you want the viewer to be aware of that process and where it came from, or do you prefer it to be this intimate or sensitive thing? Do you think the viewer's awareness of the material changes their interaction with the work?

Taylor:

I don't think that knowledge is necessary to engage with the work. I wouldn't be using the medium if I felt that, aesthetically, it wasn't successful on its own. I do think the concept adds an interesting underlay to everything in the sense that these are surreal images inside this kind of wacky frame. You can't really tell what the drawings mean and you can't really tell what the original paper means. It's just not that anymore.  It’s just not what it was anymore. People get excited when they find out about the material. They think it has hidden meaning, which is funny because again, it was the result not so much of something that happened not as a conceptual decision but a material experiment development. So I'm torn, because I don't think it's necessary to know about the material, but at the same time, the reactions that I've gotten from other people emphasize how having that information made them see the work in a different light.

Sophie:

Do you ever record any kind of process documentation?

Taylor:

No, because when I'm working, my hands get actually disgusting. Like I'm a reptile with a second skin of glue. So I try not to touch anything.

Sophie:

The physical work all seems very manual. Aside from the frames or sculpture, even the graphite drawings have these tiny sketch marks, or you're working in embroidery or on very small pieces. As you move into AI-generated work and other digital work, do you feel that loss of tangibility?

Taylor:

I definitely do. These works don't really feel like they're mine in the same way. It  feels like I'm a conduit or a curator. I'm the one pushing the button, generating them, and choosing which aspects to put together, so their existence wouldn't happen if it wasn't for me. But there's something about manual labor that is like, okay, I made this. Artists have definitely challenged this idea, and it's kind of a traditional mindset. But there's something about having a work that you made with your own hand, versus something that a computer made that you facilitated.

Sophie:

What's your process for your AI-generated works?

Taylor:

I use a website called Artbreeder. It's called Artbreeder because it literally analyzes images and then assigns "genes" to them based on a standardized image. Each image is created with these genes and you can cross-breed images that have different genes and get different results. A lot of the work is more curatorial because I generate like 300 or 400 images and then I go back and edit down to the ones that I really like. There are different formulas for AI generation that you can play around with, and you can go in and edit the genes of the images yourself. It’s  weird and dystopian, but still fun to play around with. 

Artbreeder is an interesting website because there's something skeevy about the name and the way it's having you factory-farm these images. But at the same time, the stuff you get is so precious. The moments and the colors. AI has such a unique and indistinguishable feel once you have an eye for it. There's nothing else that makes images like that and you can't really translate it. If you try to replicate it, it's not the same.

Sophie:

Displaying the AI-generated work, would those be on screens or would you print them out?

Taylor:

I've been struggling to figure out what medium to do those on because I had a studio visit and I was talking with Piper Marshall, who's curating the senior show, and she was talking about how frames act as a sort of protective element for these delicate graphite drawings. AI works are the opposite. If you’re familiar with Hito Steyerl, the AI works are like poor images. I've been thinking about putting them on fabric. I've been thinking about just projecting them. I don't know. I'm still thinking about that.

Sophie:

A lot of your work seems small scale, but you have these moments that push outward, like this big chair in the photo. Even within pieces, you manipulate the space of houses or bedrooms. What does size mean to you in your work?

Taylor:

A lot of artists are really obsessed with making really big things because of this conventionality we have that big work is more professional and sells better, or should be regarded as a higher form of art. I definitely bought into that for a long time. If I was painting, I thought it should be as big as possible. Then, I was doing an independent study with a professor who’s also the head of the art department at Barnard, Joan Snitzer. During Covid, we were working from home––I've always only really worked in my bedroom or at home. I think that's part of where the domestic stuff comes in as well.

Again, it's less of a conscious deliberation, but more about the environment that I'm in when I'm making these pieces. Joan assigned these really small works, and said to do them really quickly. If you look at the chair photo, those are the small works that are on the wall. And she was like, yeah, I don't even think you should make big works, here's your assignment: you're gonna make 300 small paintings. So I made 300 small paintings. Once you start working on a scale that's easily transportable and that you can work on anywhere, like comfortably in bed, it's hard to go back to wanting to do huge ambitious stuff.

Sophie:

You work in so many modes. Are there any materials you'd like to try?

Taylor:

I was looking into learning how to do stained glass, like ornaments or hanging stuff.

Sophie:

That makes a lot of sense. There is a light that comes through all of your work, like the drawings or the AI. They are all sort of glowy.

Taylor:

But again, I get kind of psyched out by starting with new materials. The initial commitment, ordering the kit and starting something, sometimes can feel daunting. Which is funny because I'm always doing it. 

Sophie:

Where else can we find your work?

Taylor:

I post my work on my instagram @ddddeathmetal. I also have a website. 

Shiloh Tracey

Feature by Sophia Ricaurte

Photos by Dennis Franklin

Shiloh Tracey (he/they) is a multidisciplinary creative based in New York City. Exploring the intersections of oil painting, collage, textiles and performance, they channel artwork which explores intergenerational and intercultural healing, ancestral knowledge, Black and queer subjectivities, and ecology.

This interview was conducted on an April afternoon at Riverside Park, looking toward the Hudson, sitting in the rain.

How do you like New York? 

I love New York. I’m a New Yorker by heritage. My grandfather moved here from Jamaica when he was young, and my parents and grandparents grew up in the city. I don’t know how much I’ll like the pace when I’m older, but right now, I like the dopamine rush, I love clubbing, going to concerts, park walks, running into friends, getting up early before everyone else is awake. I try not to stress myself out or rush to get anywhere. On the flip side of that joy, there is pain, loss, and existential terror. COVID cases are rising, so I’m planning to go out less. Historically, Black communities are being priced out of their original neighborhoods by gentrification, and I’m interested in abolitionist alternatives to our current policing system. 

How would you describe your background? 

I’m Caribbean-American and was born in New Rochelle. I’m trying to learn more about my ancestry, often by going through old photographs. I’ve been interested in art since I was very little and started painting seriously my junior year of high school. I’ve been going to PWIs my entire life. I went to a private school in Baltimore for K-8, and then boarding school in New Hampshire. I identify strongly with my Blackness, with my queerness and my transness. My upbringing as someone who was socialized as a woman also largely plays into how I observe myself in the world. But all of these identities are not who I am at my core. They define me in some ways, but beyond that, I’m an artist with friends who have helped shape who I am. They’re rockstars. Hopefully I've helped shape them, too. 

My Mother’s Child

Who are your influences? 

I have many influences in music, writing, and visual art. Lygia Clark  is an inspiration of mine from Brazil. She worked on proposições: incorporating viewer participation. I love The Body Keeps the Score by Bessel van der Kolk. Also Julie Mehretu, who describes her abstract work as a “time-based experiential dynamic.” Brene Brown helped me see true growth that empowers and humbles and does not respond to punishment. My mother is really important to me and so is my younger sibling Gio, who makes music @nonamedugly on Soundcloud. There are others: Ottessa Moshfegh, Haruki Murakami, Junot Diaz, Pat Parker, June Jordan, Joy Harjo, Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha, CAConrad, Coyote Park, Faith Ringgold, Kara Walker, Hilma Af Klint, Diedrick Brackens, Héctor García. I could go on and on. 

Do home and religion converge for you?

The earth is my home. My first performance art piece was literally called Earth Church. Pre-high school, I would attend Catholic church with my father and his girlfriend before I stopped having contact with them. I would also attend Buddhist convention centers and visit other practitioners’ houses with my mother. In high school, I would go with my then-close friend Ahlam to the Muslim Students’ Association every week. I’ve always enjoyed the iconography of religion, and I feel at home in the bigness and painstaking intricacy of churches and other sanctuaries. I love the Sagrada Familia in Barcelona, a one-hundred-year project. It embodies the kind of intention I’m seeking to nurture in my work. I don't focus on doctrinal religion and don't believe in any one religious institution. What I do, say, and believe is setting myself up to be at home in any place, especially because I was constantly moving when I was younger. Making a home, for instance, out of these tiny rooms in my high school and college dorm rooms, where only my furniture stays the same. 

I actually wanted to ask you about “Earth Church (Pacifist’s Polemic Against the Lawn). Could you say a little about the piece and its inspiration? 

It’s hugely inspired by Robin Wall Kimmerer, who wrote Braiding Sweetgrass. She talks about personhood in indigenous societies, not just humans, but plant and animal life: everybody in one network, all deserving to be communicated with. Before the performance, I kept seeing “lawn renovation” signs around campus. Space is so hard to come by in the city, and here was so much being used for show. In the US, there are around 40 million acres of lawn, used to grow one plant we can’t even eat. I had everybody lying down on the lawn around me in a circle. It was an invitation to feel close to the depth of the investment in this fear-based project. 

Earth Church (Pacifist’s Polemic Against the Lawn)

I feel like I often connect the natural world with the divine. Could you tell me about your sensibility in the divine? 

There is felt-knowledge that’s passed down. My loving relationships allow me to expand this safe space within myself, where my soul holds hands with God. It’s a space which contains the world within it. Occupying that space puts me in touch with past selves that I abandoned somewhere along the path. I started reading tarot this year, it’s a process of communion with your personal symbolisms and a way of developing trust in what you’ve seen and observed, and also trust in what you cannot see that is influencing your life. I’ve had some really insightful readings thus far on my own. 

Lovers in Blue

What’s your relationship with feminism?

My relationship with feminism has saved my life. I feel that way about many socio-political movements, but especially feminism. I ran an intersectional feminist club in high school with my really good friend Chinasa: my queerplatonic life partner, they’re actually the only other person I’ll trip with. We were both learning about our own capacities as leaders within an institution that didn't always appear to be friendly to or accommodating of the voices of Black folks, queer folks, and women. We were exercising our power from this love-standpoint, and that’s where I first started reading bell hooks, who is a main pillar of my feminist thought. I've been out as trans for two years now, and I started testosterone during that time, and went off of it because it didn't feel right for me anymore. 

Much of my identity is just going to be for me and my most intimate relationships. Sometimes, someone’s idea of a woman is inclusive of me as a tall Black person, other times, it’s not. It’s tricky. I also have had to steer clear of white feminism, which collapses all experiences of perceived womanhood and doesn’t take into account the nuances of privilege based on other factors. Transfeminism has been an incredible tool for me to locate myself in the world. I love Sylvia Wynter’s posthumanism. She’s a Jamaican philosopher who argues that the concept of the human itself is problematic.

How Do You Know What Your Body Is

I asked that question because it’s a preoccupation of your zine “How Do You Know What Your Body Is?

My zines were a major place where my poetry and visual arts began to intersect. The first time I called myself a boy was in my zine, which felt really good. 

BOY* Black Transmasc Reflections

That’s really amazing. What are you working on right now?

The zines were published maybe six months after I came out. I'm planning to work on another one on gender that addresses the shape-shifting I feel in my transness. This year, I’m focusing on expanding into abstract art. A lot of my poetry is about animals, social feelings, spirituality, and the Atlantic Ocean. I'm also really thinking about my senior thesis on cycles of birth and rebirth, the ephemeral nature of our world, and the things we treasure. That’s something my ex Beth and I talked about on our first date; they inspired me to do performance art and did a piece where they got legally married and divorced to someone they met on Hinge all within a month or so. My art answers a question that my body is living right now: what happens when I cultivate a gentle observation of myself, and turn it inward towards the unconscious realm within me? I’m thinking a lot about questions my body has posed to me throughout my life. Through my art, I’m investigating my body as living history. I’m making art that believes in humanity's longevity, and that in itself is prayer: creating at all, hoping somebody will be around to see it tomorrow. 

Wow. What do your creative processes look like? 

They’re very spontaneous. I’d like to systemize my process a bit more and figure out how to be more methodical about it, but for now it changes from piece to piece. It’s important for me to create an environment to be in tune with the expansiveness of my being, avoid people who cannot honor me in my fullness, and be accountable to others without being overly responsible for them or abandoning myself. I keep a dream journal and two life journals. I draw good energy from spontaneity, and I don't want to lose too much of that.

What are your current obsessions? 

Noticing and creating small kindnesses, not holding onto the resentment of space not being made for me, instead deciding to simply hold it for other people in small ways each day, and the universe pays that back to me in kind. There’s a poem about this called “Small Kindnesses” by Danusha Lameris. They’re not these grand, massive gestures but they kinda are? I also started learning to stick-and-poke this year, “angel” is in script on my leg. I love my good friend and suitemate Chrystal’s Ghanian stew, and I’m collecting movies to watch outside of the American mainstream. Two I’ve really enjoyed are Xala, directed by Ousmane Sembène and Wong Kar-Wai’s In the Mood For Love. I want to watch Chungking Express at some point, and Cinema Paradiso, a movie about memory directed by Giuseppe Tornatore. I’ve been watching a lot of Sailor Moon lately. I love Akira and have watched it several times. It incorporates the same chanting that I did when I practiced Buddhism as a child, and I love how grotesque the animation gets. 

I love that. Can you tell me something about the role of sound in the context of  Afro-diasporic and Buddhist traditions in your art?

I'm inspired by free jazz and how completely unintelligible it is. It denies musical structures and still calls itself music. I played piano for six years, and used to be in a jazz band. Jazz and abstraction are rebellious. Abstraction especially in the 60s was a huge fuck you to the art establishment. One of the things that marked jazz as a style was how it brought people together. It’s a creole genre basically, taking inspiration from both Europe and Africa. I do a lot of field recordings of soundscapes: sometimes water or rain. Soundscapes accompanying each of my paintings is something that I might try to do in the future. The jazz artist Nala Sinephro inspired me to hone in on inner silence. I’m trying to incorporate more stretches of time into my life where I just don’t speak, write, produce anything or communicate with anyone. Silence feels like a place where I don’t need to prove myself or speak to have an impact. 

Gut Wheels

What does healing feel like to you?

Healing feels like trusting myself, that I have agency, taking my drive seriously, that I exist outside my pain. It feels like believing my own experience—not looking to others to define that for me. Letting people who don’t know me well be wrong about me─not trying to chase down and correct all my afterimages. Trauma can make you believe that the whole world is out to get you, that you'll never find opportunity anywhere. Connecting with my ancestors in spirit is constitutive to how I heal. I try to build up the structures internally and make the connections externally to seek out those opportunities to carve out a life for myself, even when it feels really difficult. My body lets me know where it wants to spend my time, so it’s also about listening.

Where do you see yourself in the future?

I would love to do a solo show. There are galleries that allow you to rent out space for a month and keep the cover price of anything you sell. Freelancing is my dream. If not that, then being an art or Spanish teacher or art therapist. But I'm mostly thinking about which one of those positions will allow me the most time for art and potentially travel. 

You’re incredibly inspiring, Shiloh. Where can we find your work? 

Thank you so much! On instagram @shilohtracey.jpeg and my substack poetry can be found here

Lilly Cao

Feature by Elena Sperry-Fromm

Photos by Grace Li

Lilly Jean Cao is a senior double majoring in the history and theory of architecture and visual arts at Columbia College. Primarily working with oil painting, their work combines found cartographies with abstractions of the body, resulting in body landscapes that are embedded with socio-historical meanings.

What does your process look like? 

I begin with an idea of something general that I want to focus on. My most recent piece, Self Portrait, Pathological is interested in the pathologizing of the Asian body. It takes an abstracted, close up photograph of my back and imposes related cartographies. There are maps of wet markets, COVID diagrams, old scientific racist diagrams of the skull. I start by painting the body with gestural strokes to create texture. Then I layer one color over that and cover it with tape. I trace a cartography onto the tape, and use an exacto knife to cut out the lines. Then I repeat that several more times with new color layers so that each color intersects and peeks through the subtractive cartographies. This subtractive method works best visually and conceptually as I want to leave that space open for the obliqueness of abstraction. The visual effect resonates with history as nonlinear, as something where all points are interacting with one another. So far I have only been painting my own body, and expanding to depict models is difficult because of the violence of the process. When I work, I’m taping the canvas over, tracing onto it and then cutting out the tape, so it feels like cutting out someone's skin because that’s ultimately what I’m representing. That adds another dimension to the work which resonates with ideas of violence and transformation. [1] 

Self Portrait (Pathological)

 How does that relate to the dynamics of a map and these intersections of spaces and ideas?

 I'm interested in the history of cartography and its relationship to colonialism and scientific techno-rationalist justifications of domination. Cartography is a means to control space and implicitly control bodies. My practice tries to work through those histories by complicating the cartographic form, and by making it more abstract. I extend this by embedding it in the body and considering the way that the body has historically been treated and exploited as a form of space. 

One of the most insidious things about modern mapmaking is that it presents itself as perfectly neutral, scientific, and rational. Particularly with early maps that naturalize the colonial project, like maps depicting early colonial settlements as small encampments within a sea of white space representing empty land, which implicitly erases the people who were already there. I try to problematize that by extracting it from its ability to be representative of certain things in totality. 

Rhizome Set Drawings

With one of my pieces, Rhizome Set of Drawings, I drew from three different maps. One was an English colonial map of Shanghai, there was a Japanese map of China from one of the Sino-Japanese wars, and the third was a Chinese map of Tibet. All of these are related specifically to ideas of domination and control, but I wanted to complicate that by demonstrating the complexity of the history of China. I’m trying to dig through the nuances of that history by embracing the contradictions of the different directions of control and domination, and through viewing the map as a mechanism and ideology of control.

In the past several decades, there's been a shift in critical theory from historicism towards spatial thinking. Part of the reason for that shift is understanding the ways that social forces, particularly capitalism, are constitutive of spatial organizations globally. This turn to geography is interesting because much of the rhetoric of colonialism is constructed through depicting certain cultures, races, and ethnicities as historically backward. Space as a response to this tendency to historicize is a way of demonstrating that it's ridiculous to portray a people that are existing with you simultaneously as historically older. That space has a lot of liberatory potential. 

What does it mean to take something intimate and specific like the body and transpose it into a broader geohistorical context?

I want to problematize the idea that bodies are personal or individual. The way that we treat our bodies and the way that we see other bodies is socially constructed. This relates to the idea of queerness and non binary-ness, and ideas of gender more generally. People often underestimate how the ways that we treat our body are responsive to the way that gender is constructed, or the way that identity is constructed in society. It's not just trans people who alter their bodies in some ways, people do it all the time for medical reasons or aesthetic reasons. I'm interested in the way that skin and surface and body is an expression of social ideas, historical ideas, or a result of them or response to them. 

Close

The philosopher Elizabeth Grosz in her book Architecture from the Outside writes about the idea that, “all the effects of depth, of interiority, of the inside, all the effects of consciousness (and the unconscious), can be thought in terms of corporeal surfaces, in terms of the rotations, convolutions, inflections, and torsions of the body itself” As for my own project, I would extend that to include both interiority and sociality. The surface of your body can be an expression of something, but I don't necessarily find it to be an expression of individuality. I find it to be an expression of historical realities. This relates to another quote from Jack Halberstam in A Queer Time and Place that’s really important to me, it’s written on my studio wall, “What constitutes the alternative now is […] a technotopic vision of space and flesh in a process of mutual mutation […] for some postmodern artists, the creation of new bodies in an aesthetic realm offers a way to begin adapting to life after the death of the subject.” I understand the death of the subject as a recognition that the formerly individual or universal subject is really formed out of differentiated but intertwined socio-historical realities (and therefore cannot be understood as either individual or universal, or even really as a subject). My creation of “new bodies” by amplifying “corporeal surfaces” and embedding them with maps and diagrams, is an attempt to picture this different understanding of personhood.

What is that relationship like between interiority and abstraction?

My project and my ideas are indebted to the work of Julie Mehretu. In my work, and in Mehretu’s work, the relationship between representation and abstraction is tenuous, because we're drawing from concrete references and transforming them in ways that turn them more abstract. Abstraction allows you to represent something without being tied to signification. You can start with something concrete and then create an abstraction out of it that keeps the original referent as a haunting of the abstract result. That opens up this nebulousness that’s not doing anything didactic but that is still attending to socio-historical issues. The obliqueness of art interests me and that obliqueness is necessarily tied to the exploration of gender as not being this concrete reference, but an exploration of the way we relate to the dictates of society. The experimentation with representation is also the experimentation with how I relate to my own body, how I relate to history, and how I relate to sociality. Typically, I am depicting my own body, so by abstracting it, freeing it from the ways that the body is typically seen in the media, or the way that I'm taught to conceive of my body as an AFAB (assigned female at birth) person. By exploring the creases and the folds and the hills, I'm allowing the body to be something that it's not allowed to be elsewhere. Elsewhere it's tied to gender, tied to expression; here, it can just be what it is. 

Self Portrait (Archaeological)

In your work, how do bodies and their significance fit into both a wider historical context and a particular ascribed group identity?

The way that contemporary artists of color have to deal with identity politics is difficult because at this point, representing a minority group is profitable. So artists who aren't trying to profit from it, who are just creating work that they care about, are being exploited by the identity politics machine. Art becomes constrained by the expectations of your personal identity. Julie Mehretu, to me, is interesting because she's achieved the anonymity of a straight white male artist, even though she's a black lesbian, female artist, and it's in part through abstraction and the refusal to represent a legible understanding of what blackness looks like for her. Instead she's portraying these abstract ideas of urban spaces and architectural spaces which are touching on the problems of identity and of history and of culture. That can’t be reduced to just what her identity is. 

Skin I

Within the Asian-American community in particular, I think people are really drawn to symbols, images or cultural artifacts that we view as essential signifiers of a culture we’ve been separated from, but which are really surface-level expressions of an extremely complicated history. My parents are Chinese, but I was born here and I was raised very much detached from my ethnic and cultural context. I grew up in a predominantly Asian suburb, so many people around me have the same experience. I went to an Asian studio in high school, where many artists were trying to make art about their personal experiences by drawing from cultural artifacts that they consider to be representative of China, but really it was food items or stereotypical representations. I understand that too: I have a dragon tattoo and there's this desire to be part of our culture because we've been so separated from it, yet because we lack this understanding about it, we reach out to these surface expressions. Other queer Asian artists who went to Columbia, like Oscar yi Hou and Amanda Ba, deal with these legible symbols of Chinese culture in a way that’s really valuable, I think. Oscar specifically draws on these symbols in a highly self-conscious way and even highlights the disconnect between his inability to read or write Mandarin and his using it as an aesthetic sign. The way that my work tries to do it is more in the way of Julie Mehretu, which is to explore these ideas abstractly and to make my identity less immediately legible even as it is important to my practice. I’m finding a connection to my background through history, rather than objects or images. 

You can find Lilly’s work on their instagram @ljeancao

Sophie Paquette

Feature by Alex Avgust

Photos by Caroline Cavalier

Sophie Paquette is a filmmaker, writer and student artist in residence at the Barnard movement lab. Her work explores the themes of embodiment, chance and fortune through its playful aesthetics and depictions of radical intimacy. 

I met student filmmaker Sophie Paquette after her weekly roller-skate session in Riverside Park. As we looked for a bench––ultimately settling for the one featured in her short film: runaway––she told me she began her creative journey as a writer. The transition of her work into video format was a conscious choice, a way of rendering her process more physical: “I think I got a little antsy doing just page-based stuff. A lot of my writing was body focused, dealing with space and shape. My work was about bodily experiences, so I felt like the body needed to be physically engaged in the process of making it as well. With film, you can get your hands on a camera, you can move actual bodies in space.”

Runaway

As Sophie’s work developed, the themes it explored became deeply connected with the format it was presented in: for her, content, form and process all overlap, they are all a part of the same story. Her thematic interest shifted from dealing with themes of physicality to exploring ritual, chance and intuition—all of which she finds to be intimately connected with the way the medium of film connects with its audience. “The way we view film is very intuitive. It comes from this understanding of what it means to see things in sequence, what it means to connect a sound to an image to an amount of time.” 

While her work has a naturalistic, quotidian aesthetic, its playfully whimsical nature makes it difficult to place within the realms of reality. “All of my work exists in this weird space. I want there to be a sense of naturalism without it being necessarily realistic. There is a weird amount of coincidence and chance. That’s what I find exciting about film, finding these strange moments of fortune or chance that usually get overshadowed in real life. It’s this little magical spark.” For Sophie, a sense of magic is inherent to the multi-modal nature of film: the various elements of production come together to capture a specific moment in time in a way that cannot be replicated: “Even if I am making something realistic and narrative I still want it to have that charm of intuition and chance.” 

Out of Order

While she is comfortable with the idea of suspended reality in her work, Sophie greatly values emotional authenticity. She wants her work to feel impactful, coming from a place of real emotional experience. She doesn’t mind her work being interpreted as autobiographical, considering this just another component of presenting work to an audience: “It’s kind of funny. I performed the reading of this poem in high-school, the poem was from the perspective of a mother and one of my teachers came up to me after to ask me if I had a child. I think people want to find autobiographical meaning to performance. And that honestly doesn’t bother me.” Even if a piece isn’t explicitly about her experience, Sophie still feels like she leaves her own stamp on it through the process of making. “I do think it’s about me because I was there the whole time it was being made,” she explains. Sophie finds that her experience and her environment deeply influence her as a maker: by making the work herself, she necessarily leaves her it with own touch, regardless of subject matter. 

Look How I Like

Still, Sophie prefers to maintain an ambivalence in her work, and allow her audience to connect with it on their own terms: “A lot of autobiography just comes through. Writing creative fiction has kind of primed me for writing about myself.. I hope to make stuff that’s specific to me, but also has an amount of ambiguity so people can access it in their own way. ” She does not wish to limit the interpretive capacity of her viewers. While we can see her work as telling her own story, we can also find ourselves in it and discover our own meaning. As in all other realms of her work, Sophie likes to play with the degree to which her work is personal. “There is freedom in playing with what feels true to me but is not necessarily a personal experience, and how it can still occupy a character or a narrative space,” she says.

Recently, Sophie has started incorporating herself as the subject of her work. “When I was in high school, I was petrified of photos of myself. They made me feel horrible, and literally filled my body with dread and anxiety. But recently, I’ve gotten more comfortable with filming myself—part of it came from filming myself roller skating as progress documentation.” As a student artist in residence at the Barnard Movement Lab, a lot of her work started focusing on the movement of her own body and its potential for expression and exploration. She says/reflects, “I am much more confident moving in front of a camera now. Every single week, I go to the movement lab and usually end up filming myself.” 

She prefers to work in an intimate setting, mostly filming her friends and choosing familiar locations. Even when working on bigger projects, Sophie still prefers to have her friends involved. “I’ve been so lucky, my friends have been so gracious with their time and talents. That’s another reason why my work is so important to me, it represents the moment I realized how appreciative I am of the amount of support I have.” She is also aesthetically drawn to low-budget video work, finding it more physical and authentic: “I like when you can feel the hand that made it. You can feel the material elements of the shooting. There is no polished non-human sheen to it. The final product has an index of its own making.” Immersing herself in the intimate environment of the work’s production as well as leaning into the physicality of the process itself, Sophie finds each of her pieces to be uniquely aesthetically marked by their own making.

Self Care

Many of her videos feature depictions of radical intimacy, explored through multifaceted and often playful lenses. “I love pee scenes in movies. That’s basically what I structured the entire out of order short film around, having someone pee while holding hands. I think it’s just so complicated, it’s not sexual but it’s still so physically intimate. It’s also this thing we all do. It surpasses romance, it’s its own exalted experience.”

She finds inspiration for her process in John Cassavetes’ work, especially the manner in which he described his approach. “He talks about shooting with friends and non-actors, a lot of his first films are blurry and break a lot of filmic conventions. I was really drawn to this idea that even if you don’t have the best gear or technical prowess, if you care enough about the story, you can make something that feels electric.” She describes the insecurity she initially felt: “I didn’t know what I was doing. I’d never done it before. I didn’t have the same gear everyone had.” Applying Cassavetes’ approach helped her not only to overcome doubt but also to see the unique opportunities only accessible in intimate, small-scale productions.

House: a Sonnet: a Palinode

Sophie imagines her work being accessed in a close-knit setting. She tells me about a video installation she recently saw at the Whitney, featuring a My Barbarian retrospective, including the materials used for and in their videos such as masks and puppets as well as a large comfortable couch for viewers to enjoy the work from. More than just being comfortable, Sophie appreciates a viewing space that pays attention to the body: “I hate having to ignore the body to receive artwork. I don’t want to stand still to look at a painting, I always want to touch something and get really close.” She also appreciates the inclusion of material artifacts, as she sees their presence as grounding the final product in the physicality of its production. She sees her work being displayed in a similar fashion, allowing people to get comfortable and interact with it for long periods of time. 

Currently, Sophie is learning to do tricks in her purple roller-skates, listening to Mitski and reading Crying in H-Mart by Michelle Zauner. You can find more of Sophie’s work at: https://www.whereissophiepaquette.com

Carlos Ochoa

Feature by Cathleen Luo

Photos by Gabi Levy

Carlos Ochoa, a senior in Columbia College studying Architecture and Visual Arts, talks about the inspirations for his Goya-esque oil paintings that comment on modern issues of gender and social media. Using thick strokes of earth-tone paint, Carlos captures themes of consumption, alienation, and masculinity on his canvases. 

Carlos paints his self-portrait with furrowed eyebrows, rendering himself in moody browns and golden ochres of the classical Zorn palette. If it’s not a painting of him, then it’s other figures and characters whose anatomies twist in a moment of drama. His paintings are intense, brooding, even nightmarish at times, yet when I met with him to chat at Uris Library, Carlos was thoughtful and vulnerable about his inspirations, digging deep into the darker parts of himself to understand universal issues with body and image.

Vaquero

When I first encountered Carlos’ work on Instagram, I immediately thought of Francisco Goya’s feverish portrayals of humanity’s underbelly. Carlos is flattered by my comparison and goes on to describe how Goya’s art is “reflective horror,” something that can be seen in his own work. 

Inspired by Baldomero Romero Ressendi’s work, Carlos explains: “in very few brush strokes, Ressendi is able to completely capture the psychology of a person.” Lucien Freud is another artist that influences Carlos, though in different ways; while Ressendi paints quickly and messily, Freud puts in painstakingly large amounts of time to psychoanalyze his subjects in his paintings. 

Carlos’ process adopts this subjective approach in both his painting and digital work. Though he believes that his digital and traditional art practices hardly overlap, his approach to painting traditionally and designing characters are the same. He says: “I don't think people are that creative, we're just good at observing, and then synthesizing those observations.” Though he’s inspired by movies and video games for his digital art, the personalities he creates are derived from real people. He pulls inspiration directly from his everyday encounters: “If I meet someone that I'm interested in, I'll draw them. I'll try to think from their perspective; what does this person do? How would they react to certain situations?” He never knows exactly why he is drawn to a subject, but he runs with his interest to create an entire persona out of his observations.

Because he doesn’t always have access to live models, Carlos frequently turns to self-portraiture. Unlike many other student artists, he actually enjoys classic figure painting and drawing, and his skill in accurately rendering bodies is apparent. For his self-portraits, he looks at himself to see the ways the light hits different parts of his arm, chest, or back. He laughs and admits his process might seem a little narcissistic. 

Self-Portrait

For anyone who paints themself enough, reckoning with your own image and how you are perceived comes with the deal. Carlos says that the theme of hypermasculinity often appears in his work since it’s an issue that plagues men who grew up on the Internet. At first glance, his paintings Cake People and Parasocial look like they are feeding into a gender binary that prioritizes the male-gaze, but unpacking the discomfort that arises from engaging with his paintings reveals deeper meditations on the toxicity of hypersexuality in society. He opens up about a problem that he thinks should be talked about more: the amount of pornography that is accessible to people at a young age, and how it distorts people’s perception of gender. He explains: “Even if you're not searching for it, there's so much of it out there. I've known people who’ve been trapped in the warped reality that porn feeds them.” He finds himself still working to shed the damaging ideas about masculinity andtraditional expectations of men to be macho, aggressive, and dominant promoted by meme culture. In portraying these themes of hypermasculinity in his art, he says, “the only way I could do it was with a very literal depiction…. It's not beautiful or cool. It’s not supposed to make you feel good.” 

Cake People

He believes media like the movie The Wolf of Wall Street embodies this issue. The glorification of Jordan Belfort’s life full of money, sex, and drugs was meant to be a cautionary tale about excess but ended up doing the opposite. Everyone wants to be Jordan, the powerful, rich, misogynist. For Carlos, it’s the gluttony and vicious indulgence inherent in hypermasculinity that informs his art the most. He feels a need to warn viewers about its damaging and disturbing effects on people’s psyches.

Parasocial

When asked about how he depicts these themes of excess in his work, he replies cleverly: “Well, I use a lot of paint.” He explains that he’s noticed that there is a lot of consumption happening in his work, whether it’s people eating food, or sometimes, even each other. Figures look like they’re hungry: “We’re surrounded with so much stuff, and we always want more.” In this way, excess takes on many meanings, excess food, sex, and media in his other projects.

In order to portray this craving, he draws a metaphor to his own addiction to sugar, a playful yet sickening example of lust. He recounts: “When I first got to Columbia, I realized that you can take a fucking cake for yourself from John Jay, so I would just eat an entire cake for dinner. It's obviously not good for you, but I found myself wanting more.” This sort of pursuit of excess pleasure, followed by nausea and disgust, is a cycle that Carlos is intrigued by as a part of human nature. One way he alludes to his love for confectionaries in his art is by using thick strokes of paint because it “almost feels like food; it looks almost tasty. When I'm painting, sometimes it feels like I’m putting icing on a canvas instead of a cake.”

Lujuria

Carlos admits that his experience painting Lujuria (which translates to “Lust” in Spanish), Cake People and Parasocial, were not pleasant experiences, but he felt like had to say something about a problem that he was so aware of. 

“I’m disturbed by how normalized [addiction to porn is]. It's almost weird to not watch it. And I'm not saying it’s bad thing; it's just the sheer amount that we have, how easy it is to access, especially for young people, and there are no repercussions or warnings. You could just indulge and indulge and indulge.” 

He says those paintings were a reflection of society and his own experience. The discomfort in viewing his art is meant to warn and prompt reflection on gender and sexuality. 

Excess is evident in many of his paintings, but one that breaks from this aggressive messaging is Siren. During the first week of the pandemic, he went home to his family who just moved away from his hometown in Florida. With the social isolation of the pandemic compounded with living in a completely new neighborhood, Carlos felt unbelievably lonely. The inspiration for this painting came from a sculpted figurine he made that ended up looking like a mermaid, reminding him of Disney’s The Little Mermaid: “She must have felt so lonely when she left the ocean and lost her fish friends. That's her home. I had just moved to Texas with my family and I knew nobody in Texas.” Visually, Siren is a “simple painting with just a figure with waves, a moon, sand, and a few rocks” but for him, it captures how infinite loneliness can feel.

Siren

Staying grounded in reality is a theme that runs through his work, and it’s even evident in the color palette he uses: the traditional Zorn palette. Zorn is a limited color palette of 4 colors, yellow ochre, ivory black, vermilion (which can be switched out for cadmium red), and titanium white. In other words, the effect of this color scheme makes paintings look “real” and “old” in its use of neutrals. Few artists stick so closely to this palette anymore. To Carlos, these pigments feel “earthy, grounded, and essential. When I paint with other colors, it feels like I'm not really engaging with my world.” 

When he ends up adding other colors outside this palette, it is meant to make a statement about artificiality. The pure reds and blues that can be seen in The Cursed Party and Cake People add an eeriness to the natural and warm environment. For example, in The Cursed Party, the clowns are painted in bright, plasticky red and blue, giving the painting a sickly aura. In Parasocial, the pinks and bright blues are used to highlight the insincerity on social media and the red “Instagram-like” hearts are bright and gory, rather than cute. 


The Cursed Party

When asked about how he developed his style using the Zorn palette and his unique quick brushstrokes, he explains that he did not always paint this way: “I used to draw extremely strictly often from photos in a very formal and rigid style, very realistic, ‘objective.’ Then I had Professor Susanna Coffey who taught me to be aware of your own perceptions of the world and paint that instead.” This advice added the dynamism to his practice that is now recognizable throughout his work.

Skeletons Still Life

Carlos is aware that his paintings stir up strong emotions in people, and he knows his art brings in judgment. In reflecting on how his art might be perceived, he says: “It's scary to think about how people can react to your art. I think, for the most part, I'm pretty normal. I’m definitely not a ‘tortured artist’ but I can see how my art comes off as edgy.” 

One thing that does scare him about reactions to his art is that, though he intends pieces like Cake People, Lujuria, and Parasocial to be a disturbing warning, people might take it the wrong way. In the same way The Wolf of Wall Street failed to warn us away from Belfort’s lavish lifestyle, Carlos is scared that someone might find ​​his paintings appealing or alluring. But at the end of the day, he’s made a piece of art that should stand on its own, and he has little control over how it’s seen. 

Sewer Rats

Beyond painting, Carlos also jumps from hobby to hobby every month: this month it's welding and rock climbing. When I ask him about what he sees himself doing in the future, he says, as a Visual Arts and Architecture senior, he’s hoping to go into illustration or product design again, but he will definitely keep art on the side. “I would love to work at a movie or video game company designing characters or environments, but I would not want to make painting a full-time job.” He’s candid about his reasoning why he doesn’t want to pursue fine art as a career: “I only paint when I don't have time to paint, so basically, I always paint at the worst times possible. Like when you have an essay due tomorrow and you're like, fuck it. I want to paint. That's one of my best work happens, when there’s a rush, desperation, an outlet.”


You can check out Carlos’ work on his Instagram!

Gokul Venkatachalam

Feature by Yao Lin

Photos by Maeve Cunningham

Gokul is a junior in CC majoring in Philosophy. They are a visual artist and a poet. They describe their art as a process of “harnessing and interjecting the forces of chaos onto the page.” Gokul’s art is heavily influenced by Islamic art, abstract art, and electronic and jazz music.

Entering 3R of Potluck House, visitors of the Special Interest Community cannot help but be wonderstruck by a wall full of collages, drawings and nicknacks hanging on the wall. There are photos of friends and family members, posters politely taken from elsewhere for demonstrative sarcastic purposes (an “avoid binge drinking” sign, for instance), and many pieces of drawings on black and white sketchbook papers. These drawings, varied in size and color, are the creation of Gokul Venkatachalam, a Potluck member, a junior in CC majoring in Philosophy, and a good friend of mine.

The decorations on the wall have slowly grown in size since the fall semester. Divided by a dinner table, the left side of the wall gradually became an enormous work of collage that documents the laid-back creative endeavors and daily lives of Potluck. Over spring break, Gokul and I decorated the second half of the wall, consisting of mostly their artworks. What I love the most among these pieces of work is a duo of drawings that I happened to put side by side. There is an accidental asymmetry: while one work is vertical, the other is horizontal. Such asymmetry is connected by their shared theme. Both of them resemble mountains, yet underneath the drawings’ loose representation of mountains, which at first sight seems to be a deluge of geometric shapes, is the core of Gokul’s work: it’s both non-representational and representational, both orderly and chaotic. Gokul’s work is a visual paradox that makes its audience’s gaze and thoughts linger.

To Gokul, their work to some extent is a vessel through which the stochastic and random makeup of our universe is manifested. Chaos and order are coterminous, and their way of drawing is a method to such paradoxical madness that we see in reality. When one looks at Gokul’s art, one sees unexpectedly realistic representations out of the clusters and compositions of geometric shapes. “It's really interesting that something can resemble something so continuous and compact—very real just out of an assemblage of scribbles or triangles, or tubes and knots,” Gokul says. The random aspects of Gokul’s art are in fact coupled with a lot of intentional choices of form. In their practice, they limit themselves when producing the geometric forms, while always trying to employ negative space and be precise in the types of marks they make. Sometimes, they pursue erratic, even mistaken forms of drawing. For Gokul, these artistic choices represent a very cognitive aspect of art: “This cognitive aspect of art, I think, is often underlooked when people think about art. Being more of a process artist, and being more of a conceptual type of artist forces me to think about my artistic choices in certain types of ways. And I think my philosophical background lends itself to that.”

Although most of Gokul’s earlier works consist of black ink on white paper, Gokul has been experimenting with color recently. While they focus on exploring the textures of things that one might find strange or unsettling in their black and white drawings, vibrant colors enable them to express a wider range of feelings, from joy to morbid horror. Last semester, after seeing an etching with white ink on black canvas at the Met’s Surrealist Exhibition, Gokul started experimenting with white ink as well as metallic pens on black papers. They found themselves creating different effects with this different set of materials. For instance, the white-inked pen is less finer than the black-inked pens, therefore the lines created with it are thicker and fuller, making it possible for Gokul to work faster, try new styles quicker and experiment with their art daily.

Islamic art has been one of the most important inspirations for Gokul. As a freshman, Gokul visited the Met and was dumbfounded to find themselves immersed in a world of Islamic art. ​​Staring up at the Islamic geometry, in various tapestries, textiles, architecture, and even on the ceiling of the exhibition, Gokul discovered in themselves a passion for nonrepresentational geometric art. Gokul also found inspiration in the Abstract Expressionist movement. Jackson Pollock, MC Escher and Paul Klee among others have been big influences on their work. 

Other than visual arts, Gokul also found their passion and inspiration in other art forms: music and poetry. Alice Coltrane was one of the jazz artists Gokul listened to when they first got into drawing—they distinctly remembered that they were drawing inscribed triangles. A part of Gokul’s process is to listen to the various layers of music, and try to translate the various movements in between those layers—whether it be layers of percussion, layers of stringed instruments, or how Alice Coltrane moves her fingers on the harp. Gokul would translate the movements of the jazz artist’s musical gestures and put certain clusters on the page, or make some geometric shapes bigger than others to emphasize a broader sound. Although one might not look at Gokul’s art and immediately hear music or see the resemblance that it has with music, their drawings are an art of the act of translation of one type of aesthetic material into another type. In fact, a few of Gokul’s close friends are jazz musicians. Listening to them while they practice, Gokul would usually feel the tone and the mood, and try to express the tone and the mood through geometric translation in their drawings.

Poetry is another significant aspect of Gokul’s artistic endeavors. Along with their jazz musician friends, Gokul hosted a jazz and poetry listening party last month and performed several of their poems there. Gokul describes poetry as a process of producing a voice inside of us that we didn't know that we were even capable of. To them, this possession of the poetic voice also comes through reading other people's poetry. “When you are really, really listening to the vocal timbres of speech, it's like really, really looking closely at the way things appear to the eye. It can get to the point where you will find every object very alien and foreign,” Gokul explains. I find their understanding of poetry incredibly relevant to understanding their art. Like how they focus on controlling the geometric shapes that construct the basic foundation of their drawings, Gokul has always been imagistic and focused on the acoustics of speech when it comes to poetry. “To write poetry is to produce the sounds in your head of how people talk, and you're surprised by how full and rich those voices are that you hear in your head. Honestly, even more than the speech that you hear outside when you're on the street.” Steven Jonas and Russell Atkins have been two of Gokul’s favorite poets for a long time. Although Gokul has found them doing opposite things with language, they converge on the same musical aspect of language that Gokul enjoys about poetry.

Recently, Gokul has been carrying out a collective art project. They ask others to complete drawings with them in various  settings, whether it be at a party or just a laid-back hang-out. “Art is inherently collaborative,” Gokul says, “even if it's ultimately a drawing on a page. Despite the isolated concept of me or the self, any individual’s artworks are still contingent on the various relationships that they have with the people around them. Artists are always part of a wave or a scene. Being transparent and conscious of the fact that there's a bigger thing outside of you that's responsible for your ability to produce art is very important to me.” Last semester, Gokul had other people complete a self-portrait that they had started on their own. “I wanted to really reflect the people in my life that I see myself tethered and grounded to. Because I do feel like my sense of self is dislocated, sometimes disembodied, but more importantly, spread out amongst the people that I interact with. I can't really conceive of myself in any other way. So even when I'm alone, the voices and feelings of others are always with me. I think that's reflected in my art.”

What Gokul said at the end of our conversation in reflection about art—not only drawings, but music, poetry and all forms of art—is particularly moving. “Art is a reflection or a translation, leading me to split my sense of reality. Maybe a lot of my involvement in the  practice of art is just trying to resolve the chasm that I feel between how my thoughts, the feelings are in my head and in my body, and how it is like in the external world. Resolving that internal and external chasm has always been something that I've wanted to do. And I think art––drawing, poetry, listening to music––has helped me feel more comfortable in my body, more comfortable speaking, and more comfortable expressing myself. Sometimes there are just a lot of things that I can’t express through language that visual art allows me to do so. As a person who experiences a lot of very rich and nonverbal forms of thought—non-representational forms of thought—It's my goal as an artist to show why that kind of thought matters.”

Gokul’s work can be found at @surfaces.depths

Em Sieler

Feature by Alex Avgust

Photos by Gabi Levy

“Queer, feminist, post-internet, new media, lens based, collage, social media, attention economy, mental health. All the buzzwords.” Em Sieler tells me these are the terms they used to describe their work during a class exercise. I met Em in their cozy apartment one late evening, and after commiserating about the hectic nature of being an art student at Columbia, we started talking about the central tensions in their work. Their photography inquires into online spaces and social media, exploring the interactions between the individual and their digital presence. Their work is particularly concerned with the role they themself play in the attention economy as an artist and an image maker. 

Em creates with the awareness that most images are made for advertising purposes. “Ever since the pandemic, I’ve spent all this time on social media being bombarded with ads,” they say, describing the way they noticed commercial images selling and conflating products with identity. As consumers, we are continuously prompted to reexamine what we are wearing and what sort of people we are in the same breath, something not even counter-culture is free from: “Nozw there is the idea of being a queer Brooklyn raver person, there is influencers for that and there is brands trying to align themselves with you and be like ‘wear this brand of underwear because you’re a cool Brooklyn person.’ ” In this whirlpool of visual commodification, they base their image-making practice on the notion that “Images are not just objective, they are not just there. They are selling something to us, so I want to be conscious of what I am producing.” 

Much of Em’s work utilizes themself as a subject, tapping into the themes of self-image, self-portraiture and self-reproduction. “I would like to control the way my image is shown and consumed,” Em tells me, opening up about the way they have experienced their images being circulated and sexualized without their consent. “My body and sexuality sometimes feel out of my control, especially when I am in public. It’s something that people feel free to comment on,” Em pauses, “for some god-damn reason.”

Their work is about “controlling how my image is put out…  and not letting somebody else take me and make something of me. I’ll sexualize myself before someone else can do it, and I’ll do it in a way I wanna do it!” 

Love

Em is also interested in helping others reclaim their image in a way that feels comfortable and affirming. “I’m happy to be the queer, female-whatever photographer, cause there are a lot of creepy ass male photographers out there” they explain. Em expresses a tension between their own vision and commercial projects in this regard, balancing between the way things are “supposed to look” and what they wish to portray and evoke. 

When they are not taking self portraits, they mostly collaborate with friends: “Before COVID, I was mostly going out with friends, dressing up, and taking pictures of them just doing whatever crazy stuff that we did. And you know, just being young and depressed.” Em describes. They want their work to portray a sense of intimacy, rather than appear staged or manufactured as they are also thinking about photography as a means to construct one’s identity on social media. “The whole thing of ‘this is my image on social media, I’m doing great’: I didn’t want it to be like that, I wanted it to be real—whatever that meant. A lot of me and my friends were dealing with mental illness at the time. As we still are; as many people are.”​​ Authenticity is integral both to Em’s self-portraiture as well as their collaborative projects, their work connecting to its audience through the quotidian intimacy it evokes. It’s easy to image one’s self as simply another one of their friends, tagging along just outside the frame. 

When preparing for shoots, Em focuses on grounding themself in the emotions the work is capturing. “Getting into the body and out of the brain, as an anxious, mentally ill person, is important to me. That’s the place where I can get into my art the most and not think about it. It’s a release, that’s when it feels the most real.” They center both their art and themselves in the moment, prioritizing active––as well as physical––participation, stepping away from compulsive forethought. “I’m participating in the moment, not really thinking about what I’m going to do, what I’m going to say, what this is going to say but I’m just being in the moment with the person that I have a relationship with.” Em’s work heavily emphasizes the proximity between photographer and subject, giving the product an incredibly intimate tone. They describe their process as very intuitive, as they largely work on short term projects and rarely revisit them: “I feel anxious to just go back and be like ‘Is it done yet? Is it done yet?’ So I’ll just kind of make something in one sitting.” 

One of their important influences is Araki Nobuyoshi, a contemporary Japanese photographer, known for his juxtaposition of eroticism and bondage within a fine art context. “It’s just naked pictures, a lot of naked pictures,” they chuckle as they show me a book of his works. They were drawn to the quotidian nature of nudity depicted, in contrast with the religious and mythic nudity usually occupying museum spaces. Araki’s work made them ask questions such as “Why do we consider certain stuff porn and other stuff beautiful and art?” They are looking to embody the same stylistic features, while sparing the exploitative and voyeuristic aspects of Nobuyoshi’s work which come with the gendered dynamic of a man making images of nude women. They are also drawn to the work of John Yuyi, especially her depiction of the relationship between the self and technology, as well as her satirization of the idea of an online personal brand. Nan Goldin is another one of their favorites, especially the authentic feel with which she approaches themes of sex and gender. “I like how she shows people who are real people, who are struggling and who are not perfect, who are not the Dalai Lama or whatever. They are just her friends.” Other influences include A. L. Steiner, an eco-feminist lesbian artist, as well as Dido Moriama, whose repertoire has a quotidian, documentary aesthetic present in much of Em’s work as well. 

Lolo

They see their work as deeply personal. “Feelings are very important, because they take up a lot of my headspace,” they tell me as I leaf through a book they constructed during the pandemic. The book is a portmanteau of charcoal writing, self portraits, candid images of environments, and fingerprints. There is a deeply intimate, almost confidential, feel in the book. It’s oddly physical, for a work that is entirely limited to the two dimensionality of its surface.

For Em, art requires a careful balance between interpretation and self-expression. They tell me about reading a quote from a studio conversation, claiming “If you need to be understood, you should go see a therapist.” Ultimately, they feel like “Art needs to say something, it says whatever is important to the person and that can be closer to home or further away. Mental health is a thing that happens to be close to home and Instagram is a thing that happens to be relatable to a lot of people.” 

Their own relationship to social media has been a complicated one. In high school, they had aspirations of becoming a social media influencer as a way of connecting with others through shared interests. Growing up in a conservative college town, they felt lonely and isolated, seeing social media as a way of celebrating self-expression. As this was how they first gained interest in photography, they consider this experience an ultimately beneficial one. It allowed them to connect with people, share their work and get inspired. Yet it was also a source of anxiety. “I took a year off from school to care for my mental health, and people from home, even people from here too, would look at my Instagram and they’d be like ‘Oh my God, you must be having so much fun, you must be so happy, you look so amazing!’ And I was like literally I am miserable right now, I hate my life. It just kind of hit me that this shit is so fake.” 

Despite its potential for authenticity and agency, social media also ended up being a place of fracture and misconstruction. Torn between being honest about their experience and leaning into the facade, they ultimately decided to tell the truth: “It made me mad that people would tell me not to say it, that it was embarrassing or shameful or that people would judge me or something. And I was like I’m working on my mental health and if people don’t like that I don’t really care about them, so. I will tell the truth.” Now, they see social media mostly as a business venture, maintaining it for networking and promotional purposes. They are grappling with the performativity of an artist’s online presence—the need to put forth an image of oneself as an artist while also remaining authentic to one’s own practice. “I am definitely aware of using social media to create some sort of cool artist image or whatever. I had a professor tell me I should keep up my social media presence, that’s how editors and galleries will find me. But I don’t like it, it still gives me a lot of stress and anxiety.” 

Despite this increasing sense of commodification, their work expresses a belief in youth and the individual creator’s ability to construct a counter-narrative. They see the role of the artist as one of reclamation, as well as open communication. “I would like my art to be the thing that starts conversations. I feel like that’s so cliche, but if I could have anything, that’s what I would want. When I get messages saying ‘Your art made me have a conversation about mental health’ or ‘It really hit home’, that stuff is why I keep doing this,” they said. “Don’t we all hope that what we’re doing has a meaningful impact on people?” 

While they may sometimes feel hopeless about the future and the increasing disconnection it holds, they also hold onto the hope that their art has meaning and resonance, making people reconsider their own engagement with social media and digital spaces, giving them a route towards imagining new possibilities of connection. 

Currently they are drinking iced matcha lattes with almond milk, wearing partially transparent colorful outfits, and learning to screen print on mirrors. You can find more of Em’s work at: https://emsieler.com

Lindsay Kornguth

Feature by Jane Loughman

Photos by Maria Shaughnessy

On the Lerner ramps, I chatted with multimedia artist Lindsay Kornguth about her visual art and music, beginning by looking at her early portraits of celebrities. From YUNGBLUD in color pencil to Brendon Urie on graphite on paper, Lindsay used to share these portraits on her Instagram in high school, hashtagging and tagging the names behind the famous faces. However, Lindsay believes these portraits are not simply a way for her to garner attention from these A-listers. She doesn’t see them as tributes to the artists, but rather as her own work. Actors, singers, bands, and fictional characters are important for Lindsay’s inspiration, not just for her visual art but also for her own career as a musician. 

(Left) Colored Portrait Study (YUNGBLUD), (Right) Black and White Portrait Study (Brendon Urie)

Since developing her skills in portraiture, Lindsay has branched out into animation and graphic design, and now majors in computer science with a concentration in visual art. However, Lindsay’s lowest grade in high school was in visual arts. Despite her parents spotting hints of a creative gene in young Lindsay’s doodles and sketches and later enrolling her in art classes, her high school art teacher did not respect her work. The teacher wanted Lindsay to make “real art,” not “cute” portraits of famous people and characters. Lindsay contests that point of view, and rather, views her work as a practice in perception; she says this herself on her website, which notes, “whatever I end up doing in life, I must somehow express my unique perception of the world.”

Black Panther

“I'm making something original. I'm seeing things the way that I see them. When I make portraits, it starts more with a fascination for the art itself, and drawing faces [...] is something that I always found extremely difficult,” she says.

Lindsay is often eager to take on new art forms, but she can be hesitant if it does not come naturally. She used to have a grudge against digital art, but now she is a big fan of her drawing tablet, with which she recently created a Spider-Man graphic. Lindsay tells me working on a tablet feels like sketching on paper, so she didn’t feel too out of her comfort zone. Since starting college and taking classes, she has also developed an interest for animation. She created a stop motion flipbook animation of Octopus, in which you can see her combine her skills in drawing with her love for visual storytelling. 

Spidey

Visual storytelling is still evident in her earlier works, as Lindsay enjoys playing with traditional subjects in art. 2 Cool 4 Skuul, an anatomical study of the skull drawn with prismacolors, introduces color to a classical art training exercise. Dance Macabre features another skull, but within it is an optical illusion of two fencers. In Portrait Distortion, Lindsay distorts a marble statue using graphite. 

Lindsay values her years of art training, but she has a love-hate relationship with studio art classes. In these classes, the subjects couldn’t include the likes of celebrity portraits, much to her dismay. Younger Lindsay would find class teachings, like routinely drawing hands to perfect the bodily form, frustrating. Now, she has reconciled with her adversity to classical drawing techniques, realizing that it's part of a learning process: "You're not going to get better unless you do the kind of boring things."

The classes have paid off as Lindsay has mastered drawing the hand. Her piece Submerged, a technically complex piece involving differing textures of water, foam, and bubbles features a man with cuts on his face and hand. The mark on his hand is small and subtle, but one can feel the wound. In Detailed Texture Study, as its title suggests, Lindsay again experiments with texture, this time with the texture of dripping blood instead of scratches. “I wanted to capture the feeling of blood coming down the wrist,” she tells me, and she does create that sensation viscerally with thick lines. For this piece, she was inspired by Panic! at the Disco’s album Pray for the Wicked, the “devil’s key,” and gore featured in Brendon Urie’s music videos. Though she takes inspiration from outside sources, Lindsay has found personal meaning in her drawing’s symbolism: “The fist feels triumphant, and it's covered in blood, which is kind of gory. It was more this idea of getting out of something painful. To me, the key represents new opportunities, new paths, and moving forward.”

(Left) Submerged, (Right) Detailed Texture Study

Music, particularly album art or music video aesthetics, forms crucial inspiration for Lindsay. Inverted Recreation is, as the title suggests, a recreation of Missio’s cover art for their song 'Everybody Gets High,' drawn as a photo negative and inverted. For a recent graphite drawing, Living Vicariously, Lindsay uses visuals from Muse’s music video for ‘Won’t Stand Down.’ She plays with the idea of control and technology: “the hand is not like the one that's playing. [The machine] is playing the hand that's playing the piano, which I thought was kind of trippy.”

Living Vicariously

Inverted Recreation

Lindsay finds her relationship to music and her connection to art very similar. She describes the two practices as being “locked-in”,  both with “rhythmic” and “repetitive” qualities After playing piano for thirteen years, she moved over to the guitar, picking it up very quickly with her musical background. She started a punk rock band—The Blowouts—at Columbia in her first year, but since the pandemic began, Lindsay has been focusing on her own music, uploading covers to YouTube. She was discovered by the record label 11:11 Music Group after her cover of Glass Animals’s ‘Heat Waves’ garnered tens of thousands of views. Together, they mixed the cover for Spotify, and it now has over 180,000 plays.

“So that's how that happened—it was just exciting. But other than that, I haven't been dropping a ton of music, so it's funny because I've got like one song on my Spotify.”

Lindsay does have original music on her Soundcloud, both songs having her own cover art designs. During quarantine, when Lindsay was cooped up in her music studio, she reflected on how life had changed drastically at the beginning of her formative college years. So, with MUSE as an inspiration, she created the alternative rock piece ‘THUNDR.’ Making the song allowed Lindsay to develop her range as a vocalist. When she sang for The Blowouts in a more punk manner, her vocals in her ‘Heat Waves’ cover are soft and dreamy, while in her original songs ‘GHOST’, it’s energetic, and in ‘THUNDR’ it’s moody. 

Music was an escape for Lindsay during quarantine, and she felt that the isolation was essential for her creativity and flow. Moving back to New York and experiencing the city opening up again complicated her ability to make music in the same way. “Going insane in my room is the main inspiration for a lot of the art that I made. I didn't have as much of that type of setting [when I moved back here], which I thought I needed to make art. I thought I could only create things if I was locked up somewhere.” Lindsay is currently working on adjusting this attitude, as she realizes that that kind of isolated lifestyle was no longer sustainable. Now, she believes that by giving herself space and time to reflect, “things will come naturally.”

As an artist, Lindsay sees no limits to her creativity. She is often questioned about how she has many artistic endeavors, that it sometimes comes across to others that she has “no idea what the hell [she] want[s] to do” with herself. But Lindsay does have an idea: she hopes to employ her drawing skills as an animator, all while keeping up with her many other artistic practices. To Lindsay, artists shouldn’t feel limited to one area or medium. Inspiration comes in many forms, and ideas need to have the freedom to be executed in a variety of ways. Making art is like an addiction, she tells me, that surpasses any one medium.

You can keep up with Lindsay Kornguth’s work on her website and reach out to her for commissions or collaborations through her Instagram, @lindsaykornguth.

Lauren Zhou

Feature by William Lyman

Photos by Dennis Franklin

Lauren Zhou is a sophomore at Barnard College. Her photography revolves around personal photojournalism projects with the aim of storytelling. 

In the far corner of Hex and Co.––where the walls are covered in different iterations of Scattergories, Codenames, and Catan––I talk with Lauren Zhou about her camera. It’s a Canon 5D Mark II, covered in scratches and missing the top button. It’s the same one she’s had since 2016. Despite its imperfections, Lauren talks affectionately about her long history with the camera. “It's literally been with me throughout this very long journey of me navigating my relationship with photography,” she explains. While she likes to constantly redefine her relationship with the art, one thing has remained the same: making the camera so much more than a missing button, but an object of her own personal mythology.

Currently a sophomore at Barnard, Lauren began experimenting with photography in middle school. She describes photographing landscapes she found pretty, or taking portraits of friends. Eventually, however, she found more meaning for the practice, focusing her efforts on personal photography projects with the aim of storytelling. However, the road to this conclusion wasn’t easy. Lauren describes a series of collections that changed her, along with the ebbs and flows of inspiration, finally leading her to now––where she feels more in command of her craft than ever.

Born in the U.S, she moved to the Philippines when she was seven which shaped her artistic journey. “My photography would be completely different if I wasn't raised in the Philippines.” Towards the end of her high school years, the stress of college applications and leaving the Philippines loomed. “I was really anxious all the time. I was waiting on college applications to come back. I needed an outlet for all of my anxiety.” Lauren explained, “so what I decided to do was to just walk around Manila and take photos of strangers I talked to.” This became her first major photojournalism project––interviewing and photographing people she encountered in Manila.

The series made her feel a lot more connected to the Philippines: “the photosare a way for me to look back on and remember my home for so many years.” The Philippines - 2019 series was Lauren’s introduction to the world of photojournalism, a practice which helped her better understand her city and her relationship to photography. “When I'm in a city, I look for its character and the things that distinguish it from other cities. [In Manila] the people are so bubbly, kind, and welcoming. And I saw that when I would interview people and they would talk about their family.” She remembers thinking: “I'm gonna miss this country so much.”

Following the Manila series, Lauren adapted this interview model for future projects. After coming to New York, she finds opportunities to interview and photograph any characters that stand out to her. “There's this one photo on my New York series of this man who would sit near the window in Starbucks every single day and he always had a different book. He was just the nicest person ever, and now, he’s not a stranger.”

Yet, commissioned portraits during graduation season posed a challenge to her enjoyment of photography. “During grad season last year, I really lost inspiration. I was doing it more for the money than I was for the actual artistic expression. I was asking: does this really have meaning for me?” Many artists struggle with the idea of monetizing their work, and for Lauren, this meant the creative outlet she has always returned to during hard times became alienating.

“After grad season, I stopped doing photography in the summer.” Lauren explains. Only after her grandma’s passing did photography re-enter her life as a source of comfort and a way of processing her loss. From there she sought to use photography to make a celebration of her paternal grandparents, who work and live in Flushing, Queens. “It's like my second home in New York,” she says of the neighborhood, where she visits a couple times a month. Her Flushing photojournalism project, Model Minority - 2019, explores the American Dream as it relates to Asian Americans in New York. Growing up as a first-generation Chinese American, Lauren felt “so much pressure to exceed academically.” She explains: “A lot of people think of Asian Americans as a monolith. They excel academically. We live out the American dream. But that's not necessarily true. Especially for what I've seen in Flushing.”

The series is “a celebration of Flushing and all of its service workers,” as well as a celebration of her family. The process “was closure for me,” following the death of her grandma, reaffirming photography as a creative, healing presence in her life. 

When asked how she plans to continue her photography in the future, Lauren seems to have found the balance she was always searching for. “Doing commissions and commodifying your art is just draining. I don’t want to feel forced to take photos.” During last year’s grad season, where she was taking commissions for portraits, her art became her source of disposable income. There was “a lot of pressure to do shoots for money. But because of that, I got so tired of something that used to bring me so much joy. I wondered: is this really worth the trade off?”

Nowadays, Lauren is looking to challenge herself with editing and storytelling. “Now that I know that I'm doing photo projects for myself,” she begins, “I want to go out of my comfort zone.” Her new approach is perhaps best exemplified by her return to portrait photography, taking something that used to feel uninspiring and curating an environment to communicate an artistic intention. “When I look back at them, my grad portraits lacked character.” In her Vivian - 2019 portrait series, she was determined to challenge herself. “I let her do whatever she felt right about. And then, I took artistic control with the location and editing. I enjoyed the shoot so much more.” 

You can find Lauren on Instagram @laurenzhou_ and her portfolio online: https://laurenzhou.myportfolio.com/.

Tejasri Vijayakumar

Feature by Isabella Rafky

Photos by JP Schuchter

Tell me a little bit about yourself!

My name is Teji, I use she/her pronouns. I grew up in Yonkers and went to school in the Bronx.

In school, I was mostly focused on STEM; I was the only girl in all my classes for the most part. Outside of school, I did Indian dance and interned at a lot of museums in the city, which got me interested in the importance of art. I also took this class where I read The Picture of Dorian Gray, Orlando, and Giovanni's Room. I became immersed in all these  texts and spaces surrounding art. When I was applying to college, I was interested in both computer science and art, and I’m now studying both.

You dance, paint, draw, code, the list goes on – do you use a similar artistic approach for each of these facets of your creativity?

There’s a lot of overlap between dance and art. I started both in a rigid way. Art started with trying to draw super realistically. Especially when I was younger, it was mostly, Oh, can I draw a really realistic apple? Eventually, I started to loosen things up and make things more my own style, adding my own brushstrokes here and there.

It's the same with dance, where I started with very concrete lines and steps. As I got older, I started to deviate from that formality. In dance it’s being more expressive, especially with my face. I used to never move my face; I looked angry most of the time. It took until junior year to be able to use my face in dance. Indian dance is very narrative, so facial expressiveness makes it easier tell stories and put yourself into the character.

Kolam, 2021

With computer science, it feels the opposite. A project intuitively makes sense in your head, but then you have to make it so that a computer understands your thoughts. It’s going from this abstract idea and making it rigid enough for a machine to be able to compute it. I have this idea of a Cartesian plane, where art is one of the axes and computer science is the other. Between the two, you're going from super rigid to super expressive, intuitive to hard coded. I think becoming expressive but in a weird, digitally confined space could be a fun challenge.

Did where you grew up influence your artistic practice? 

Definitely. I went to a private school my whole life where mostly everyone was white. That was a huge factor growing up. I always felt like my culture was super valuable, but not something that I could talk about all the time. We would be reading like, Emerson and Thoreau, and I’d be like guys, this is just like the Bhagavad Gita. Everyone would be like, Cool, that means nothing to me, because I don't know anything about your culture. Now, I have so many friends who are brown, and friends who aren’t weird about my culture and whatnot. I talk about it all the time.

I also had a ton of access to public art and museums, growing up in the city. I’ve been taking art classes since elementary school. I have this core memory from third grade: in my art class, we were learning Chinese ink brush paintings. I had a white teacher, so it didn’t really make any sense. We were looking at these ink brush paintings and then trying to copy them, and she would walk around and be like, “Oh, your brushwork feels too Western.” I mean, why wouldn’t they be? We were third graders and no one was Chinese. Who was going to have the visual context? Something about her comment just made me think about this question––what does it mean for a brushstroke to be “Eastern”?

Oftentimes, when you see something visually, you can identify it with a place. That’s something I've always searched for with my art, because my identity’s been so convoluted and mixed up with everything else. It's hard for me to distinguish what is visually South Asian or South Indian, and what came from elsewhere. That's a lot of what I'm trying to look for in my art.

Paati and Tatta, 2020

What intrigues you about making art; why do you do it? 

I am usually bad at putting things into words. I’m not the most verbally competent person, especially considering my mother tongue. There are a lot of things that I want to write about or read, at the intersection of so many different languages. At the end of the day, I think art is about expressing yourself or expressing something. The preface of The Picture of Dorian Gray has a whole thing about this. If I had an argument to make, I would write an essay, and that would be fine. But, usually I don't really know where I'm going with things; there’s a level of nuance or uncertainty that art allows for, where I can express myself without offering anything concrete. 

What’s your artistic process like? 

Usually, I work from a picture and I'll try to make it weird. For example, I have a piece called Ardanareeshwaran [(Millat and Magid)] that’s split into quadrants. It’s based on a picture of a temple in India that was blown up by the British. The God that it's depicting is bifurcated, because it's half male, half female. I took the picture, cropped it, and messed with the colors a lot. Then I split it in half twice, and collaged it back together. Most of the time, if I'm working from an image that I already have, I'm not trying to make it super natural. I'm trying to mess with it and ask myself, what information do I have to keep to get the essence of this, what can I do without? 

Ardanareeshwaran (Millat and Magid), 2021

How do you want your work to be shown or experienced? 

This one's tricky because, especially with paintings like Ardanareeshwaran [(Millat and Magid)], I can't tell if I want to preface it with context beforehand, or if I want people to see it first as abstract shapes. I don't know which one is better. But if I had a gallery, I would not want it to be a white box. I’d want it to be a kind of performance space. There a lot of senses that are specifically Indian that would bring my work to life. To get the full experience that I feel, you need something other than visuals… you need to smell coconut oil, or hear a tabla in the background, or to take your shoes off before entering the space. If I could have complete control, I would make viewers do little things like that; participate in these rituals that would situate you better in my work. 

Speaking of divinity, how has Hindu mythology, spirituality, and its culture affected you and your material work?

It's hard for me to separate the things I grew up with and the way I currently think. It was exciting to incorporate Hindusim into my art, because it felt like everything in my life was connected. That feeling made me really happy. It’s frustrating, because I always wanted to explain these connections to people, how beautifully these things all fit together, but I struggled to do it with words. It’s spiritual to connect art to Hinduism and the way that I understand the soul and energy and stuff like that. That's mostly what I'm trying to do with my art, express that weird moment of clarity, the Whoa, it feels like everything in my life happens for a reason and it all is clicking right here and now.

You were saying how Indian dance is narrative. Have you ever taken ideas from a dance to then represent in your art?

Simha Vahini, 2019

Yes! In the beginning of junior year, I had what's called an Arrangetram, which is a graduation ceremony of sorts for this type of dance. It requires so much practice; I was practicing six hours a day at a point, it was crazy. My whole performance was three hours, and the longest dance I did was 30 minutes. Each one tells a story. There's one, the one that I told you about, called Simha Vahini (2019) where I painted myself as that goddess. The backdrop is Van Cortlandt Park, because that's near where I went to high school. That was fun. I was interested in transplanting this goddess that you see in an Indian context into the context of my own life. Also, a huge part of Hinduism is recognizing that God isn't actually separate, that it's within yourself. With this painting, I was looking internally for something rather than externally. 

Bhakti, 2018

There was another one called Bhakti (2018) that I really liked. I made that when I started learning how to use my face in dance, because Bhakti means devotion and that's a very hard emotion to convey on your face. It's really in the eyebrows; I was focusing on the feeling of making your eyes look kind of sad, but your mouth happy. In the dance I had to do this for, I was playing the mother of the god Krishna. It wasn't really supposed to be my face. It was about the feeling of making that face. Something about keeping your eyebrows pursed; it's interesting. That's how it started, and then it kind of morphed into whatever.

The Metrocards Series blew my mind– what do you like most about painting on unconventional surfaces?

The Metrocard Series

The reason I prefer paint over anything else is because you have a little bit less control over it. Changing the medium becomes an easy way to bring yourself out of your comfort zone again, snap yourself out of it. Once you get a little too comfortable with the routine of something, the practice gets worse. You have to always be a little bit on your toes. Metro Cards are shiny, a little glossy. When I was using acrylic paint, it kept slipping off. It took a really long time. I usually paint in layers, but I couldn’t because every time I painted on top of something, whatever was underneath it would go away.

Euterpe

That was fun, because I had to kind of retrain myself by working with new mediums. I did this too with a violin, where I poured acrylic paint on it first. The back is really textured with yellow paint, and it drips in a fun way. When I painted over that, it crackled a little bit with the wood. I also did one on lace. I just sewed the lace a little bit so that the paint wouldn’t slip through. I was still using acrylic paint, but it almost felt like watercolor because it would seep through everything. Those are definitely fun ways to reset.

Do you see yourself as an artist or do you imagine working professionally as an artist?

Every time I talk to my T.A.s about their MFA program, it’s super interesting. I really want to do something like that. But I also can't imagine the weird business side of it, being represented by a gallery, selling your art to collectors, selling my art in general. I should be better because I would love money, but I am very bad at it. Also, this is kind of self deprecating, but I feel there are people who have a more clear understanding of what they're trying to say with their art. My creativity goes through waves, where sometimes I'll be super creatively rich, and other times, I can’t even look at paint.

Millat and Magid, 2021

That being said, creativity is the only thing that can't really be outsourced. There are a lot of careers that are going to become nonexistent, especially in computer science. I think in 40 years, maybe less, every computer science job will be replaced by a robot. The only thing that you can't really do that to is creativity and art. I put myself in a good position here where I can't really be outsourced. It would be cool to do something at the intersection of computer science and art. During my internship at the Jewish Museum, curator JiaJia Fei spoke to us and said, “paintings exist because there are walls.” Now that we're moving into a digital space, we need to create something new for that. I'm not talking about NFTs, but I think there is a huge potential for art to be changed and democratized; it would be cool to be involved in that.

Thank you for speaking with us! Where else can we keep up with your work?

My website is https://tejasrivijayakumar.wixsite.com/artportfolio and my Instagram is @tejasriii.

Samia Menon

Feature by Mel Wang

Photos by Caitlin Buckley

Samia Menon is a junior majoring in Computer Science and minoring in Anthropology at Columbia University’s School of Engineering and Applied Science (SEAS). Hailing from the beautiful Cleveland, Ohio (“a shimmering jewel of the Midwest,” as she so aptly describes it), Samia creates art that focuses on the intersection of technology and humanity. Her work includes graphic illustrations, data visualizations, and interactive pieces.

“This isn’t an interview—it’s actually a commercial for Chef Mike’s Sub Shop,” says Samia Menon as I hit the record button. She says this matter-of-factly, with a face so deadpan that I question whether I should even bring out my interview questions. “Yeah, this is a hype scheme,” she explains. “I’m actually an undercover agent for Chef Mike, posing as a young artist at SEAS and trying to promote the Sub Shop by sitting for magazine interviews.” 

It is this tongue-in-cheek sense of humor that characterizes all of Samia’s artwork. From her playful illustrations for The Blue & White magazine to her quirky coding projects (which include apps that can read your tarot cards and match you with the perfect plant), Samia is truly an artistic jack of all trades.

Samia, what led you to your major combination? (Computer Science major, Anthropology minor)

In a strange way, I’ve found myself becoming like Barbie in the sense that I enjoy experimenting with different fields. You know how there’s a Barbie doctor, a Barbie astronaut, a Barbie baker, a Barbie artist, blah? That’s who I want to be.

I also like tweaking technology to fit the needs of people. In a world that’s continuously improving its technology, I believe it’s important to have people in tech who care about the people they’re making the technology for. In the world of tech, it’s really easy to forget the human side of things, but I think you can tell amazing stories from data - yield migration, gentrification, redlining, it’s all data that represents the human story. I figured that if I could use my computer science skills to do good by people, then that’s a life well spent.

Created in Processing, COVID-19 "Painting" is a program that uses the death rates of different ethnic groups to produce a ‘painting’ that visually depicts the data, creating an engaging story solely through data

The tagline on your website is “tech w/ humanity.” What does that mean to you?

It’s my motto when I’m coding, really. The tech world is a manipulative one—even in my computer science classes, we’re learning about ways to use tech to manipulate people and turn a profit on them. I find that very strange. I know that we’re living in a late stage, capitalist era, but we shouldn’t lose sight of why we work in tech, which is to make people’s lives better.

Does this focus on humanity also apply to your non-coding projects, like your illustrations for The Blue and White?

Yes it does! I was illustration editor last year for The Blue and White,  and it was such an honor to work with so many talented illustrators. When working on editorial illustrations, I was trying to visually depict the human side of our articles. With any illustration, I start by wondering how I want a viewer to feel when they see my work. I usually want to grab their attention with colors, which is where a lot of my influences (old Cartoon Network shows, Studio Ghibli movies) come in, because I’m obsessed with using color and movement in my work. 

Could you talk more about your influences?

Well, they’re not high brow, art museum influences, but sure! I grew up on a steady diet of Cartoon Network, pop culture—basically anything that was made for kids, I fell in love with and used in my own work. I really liked the art style of the TinTin comics growing up, along with Asterix, oh, and a really good Cleveland-based graphic novel called Paper Girls. And video games!  I was a big Pokemon fan - gotta catch ‘em all! And Street Fighter, and Undertale, and—god, I could go on, but I just think there’s something really miraculous in a clump of colorful pixels telling a story.

Did you fall in love with video games for their stories?

100% yes. Even with simpler games like Pokemon and Street Fighter, the player still has a main goal. And that’s the computer science part of it - you’re making these characters, making these worlds, out of pixels and code, and they all come together to tell a pretty awesome story.

What’s more important in your work - story or aesthetics?

So you know how you’ve just finished watching a movie, but you haven’t processed it yet? Or you finished a video game, and then you see the end credits play? I don’t know about you, but I get this sense of numbness, like I’m still working through what I’ve achieved. It’s that little gap between going through an awesome story and understanding it, and that gap is just a jumble of visuals and narrative. I want to make art that exists in that gap. Art that smorgasbords aesthetics and storytelling into one big, impressive piece that you can’t stop thinking about.

Do you prefer small or big projects?

So right now, I’m only capable of really tiny things. The goal is to make projects that belong in the MIT Media Lab - just big room-sized interactive projects that rope the viewer into a story they can’t get out of. For example, with my Koi coding project, where it’s a bunch of koi fish swimming on your screen - I want to expand that to have an entire room of koi swimming in a sine wave pattern, and I want people to come into the room and feel like they’re sitting at the bottom of a koi pond.

Koi by Samia Menon

So existing in that little gap - is that something you want to pursue after you graduate?

Yeah, definitely. The plan is to work for a nice software engineering company that’s ethical - emphasis on ethical! Eventually, I’d like to start my own fully ethical company and hopefully put out projects and products that combine technology and anthropology. And then maybe grad school, combined with making more art that combines computer science and humanity. Big dreams.

I think you’re already doing so much in terms of combining product and ethics - especially with your current project, Rayn Naturals!

Oh wow, you found that! That project’s on a roller coaster  right now, but you’re right in that it’s a product that focuses on the human side of things. Rayn Naturals is an eco-friendly invention of mine that I started working on when I was a freshman. It stemmed from the cockroaches populating my residence hall  — they just kept coming back to our shower. So I thought, this is silly, let’s fix this. My friends and I read a bunch of papers online and found out that essential oils are really effective in shooing away cockroaches without hurting them, so we designed a drain cover that you can use in your shower or in your kitchen sink to ward them off ethically. I don’t normally work on product design, and I have more experience working on coding projects or illustrations—but I learned a lot from working on Rayn Naturals, and I’m proud that we made a product that’s humane and ethical.

Rayn Naturals, 2021

So we’re winding down our interview here - what’s next for you, Samia?

I’m not sure, really—it feels like there’s so much to do! I think I’ll be working on existing in that little gap like we talked about and working on my skills from there.

Where can people find your work?

My website portfolio is bysamiam.com, a lot of my work can be found on The Blue and White website, and my instagram is @samia_mnn.

Venice Ohleyer

Feature by Aditi Kapoor

Photos by Jane Mok

Sometimes electric blue hair balayaged with blonde highlights, a byproduct of a past that needs no recounting, is not about philosophical substance––it’s simply silly. Not to mention it looks cute. So believes Venice Ohleyer: part time student, full time comedian. A gift to Columbia from a substandard college we don’t speak of [Dartmouth], Venice has made several headlines in her time here. This includes being featured by the capital-O-fficial Instagram of Columbia University in the City of New York (or as Venice calls it, the greatest college in the greatest university in the greatest city in the world). In that light, one can often refer to her as an inhouse celebrity. 

I met Venice in an off-campus cafe on 103rd street, purposely distanced from the maddening crowd that occupies the halls of Butler. Spotting her from afar in her fluorescent jacket, I couldn’t help but concur that she has the most colorful aura. Completed by her eclectic selection of eyeshadows, and even more eclectic comedy sketches, one can usually find her florally dressed, or in a fashion she describes as “space alien-y,” in John Jay, sipping on her new favorite obsession: broccoli cheddar soup—newly distinguished by her as a culinary phenomenon, and not just another soup. 

Engendering phenomenons is part and parcel of being a creative writing major. For Venice, writing doesn’t always have to be scholarly; it could also be fun! When asked why she chose to pursue comedy––of all things––Venice claimed her love for the art form simmered intrinsically and was propounded at LaGuardia, local-celebrity-churning-haven, where the value of performing arts was never questioned. She recalled the head of the department, “a somewhat devil figure, synonymous to Terence Fletcher from Whiplash, saying: ‘people who are always observing, end up being writers.’” Yet, Venice “didn’t want to be a writer,” she explains, “I wanted to perform!” Today, she’s found a way to do both. 

Comedians have an edge over their audience and perhaps it’s because comedians “are people who notice things that other people don't notice.” More than doing things for shits and gigs, there’s an innate psychological analysis behind the art of stand-up comedy, which Venice argues, is in fact art. Stringing together a hilarious narrative doesn't begin to cover stand up, there is a lot more that one’s personality needs to bring to the table, including an overarching sense of self awareness, which Venice believes is of imminent importance, almost to a crippling degree. 

All the prerequisites that come before being a successful performing artist, however, do not restrict one from performing in multitudinous ways. Venice is the epitome of a multimedia artist. Not only has her work been published in longform in Columbia Spectator, it has also found its way to Twitter’s banned accounts list. The infamous story of Joe Biden’s parody account both precedes and haunts Venice’s being in equal measure. “Someone’s gotta do it, you know,” she said about impersonating Joe Biden, “it was to underline the almost blase, blanket-like statements from the people in power that made me think, what the hell are we doing?” The tweets were her attempt to acknowledge the hypocrisy of performance activism on the internet. One would be hard pressed not to mention that Venice’s tweets, eerily, did indeed resemble real tweets from the actual President of the United States. 

Fuelled by the uneasiness brought along by American statesmanship, Venice also curated CDC’s guidelines for fully vaccinated people, which hysterically laid down a listicle of things one could partake in, once fully vaccinated. Her list, in true comedic fashion, proved to be more conscious of the pandemic than CDC’s, which can be deemed as yet another play at governing institutions that often flounder in the face of crisis.

CDC Guidelines by Venice

Some comedians hesitate intermingling politics with comedy, but Venice’s work makes one ponder the discrepancies and shortcomings within our systems. It’s a way to perhaps wield comedy as a tool to overturn the dynamic between the masses and the government. Although, this dynamic is often challenged by diplomacy, hence, the sad demise of Venice’s eight-year-old twitter account, now resting in remembrance. The Twitter debacle, however, didn’t deter her quips. As of August 2021, to bite all impersonator-claimers, Venice’s alter ego has resurfaced on the internet as her unflinchingly true self— @venicesvagina.

 Comedy is certainly not black and white, if anything, for Venice, it's an expansive palette that allows her to express herself in prolific ways. “It's like when something crazy happens to you, there's potentially a way to turn it into something better or something fun, like ‘oh, I just noticed this person do this batshit crazy thing’ and maybe I can make a sketch out of it.” The best skits, she agrees, are grounded in reality. They are an extension of one’s experience in the world. In the same vein as being a creative writing major, Venice looks at curating stories based on the subjects she encounters, or the instances that befall her: “that's why people respond to comedy, because they're like, oh, yeah, the same thing happened to me, I recognize that behavior.” On a certain plane, comedy arouses a shared human connection by demystifying life experiences and celebrating commonality.

One of the many reasons for her deep rooted commitment to comedy is its unpredictability. What one may find funny can often land abysmally in front of an audience. Ergo, one can’t only be a master of words— they also have to be a master of people. Venice is on a journey to be just that; figuring out trends while being comfortably distanced from the world of TikTok, she wants to be real, with the people, for the people. Her online performances, that mostly avail the hands-free video feature of the Instagram app, are working to unite the masses, even if it may be in the name of broccoli cheddar soup. Secretly embodying her suppressed main character syndrome, she’s patiently awaiting the day Columbia Dining finally notices her. 

Short by Venice

Venice’s work can be found on https://www.veniceohleyer.com/, and her favorite medium of distribution, Instagram, at @effervenice. Her twitter fame is amassed on @veniceohleyer1 and @venicesvagina. She can also be found performing with Columbia's oldest improv group, Fruit Paunch. 

JULIE KIM

Feature by Sabrina Bohn

Photos by Em Sieler

I met Julie Kim on a cool Saturday evening just as the sun had set, leaving the blue glow of night in its place. Julie had just come from a long day at work as a studio assistant for another artist. She was carrying a portfolio bag, had splatters of paint on her fingers, and possessed a quiet passion that permeated our whole discussion. 

After attempting to go to a closed Joe’s Coffee, we ended up in the piano lounge in Lerner. It started off quiet, with only a couple of other people working around us, but as the evening progressed, people’s conversations around us grew louder, and someone started playing the piano. As Julie and I talked about her art, the ambiance–an aspect integral to many of her paintings–came through as she discussed her inspirations and the emotions behind her pieces. 

Julie first encountered art at a young age, attending classes with a painter in her neighborhood. However, she became serious about art when she began attending Ashcan, a studio in New York, that was just a train ride away from her home in New Jersey. Every day after school, she would spend hours making art. “That was my first experience knowing that art is what I want to do,” Julie says. 

She mostly drew and painted with acrylics as a child, but creating art at the studio drew her to oil painting, her main medium now. “When I have a paintbrush there's more room to let go and be free. I love building things up with color,” Julie expresses. “I also appreciate the waiting process as the paint dries. That's helped me to be more deliberate about what colors I want to put down and where.” 

People Watch (2019)

Kate in Chicago (2020)

Julie not only built up her knowledge skills at this studio but also created lasting and memorable relationships. She met her best friend and now roommate, Kate, at the studio, who is featured in People Watch (2019) and Kate in Chicago (2020). Although Kate explores different realms of the human experience in her filmmaking, “People Watch was the first painting that embodied my creative motivations today and truly appealed to me as subject matter. That sparked the initial vision and ideas for a lot of my paintings now. The colorful lighting was all improvisation and gave me the courage to paint in make-believe things in the future based on my instinct and vision,” Julie says.

Working at Ashcan also gave Julie a feeling of independence and a sense of belonging in New York. In many of her pieces, including Remembering or holding onto disappearing moments in blue (2019), New York serves as an inspiration. “I really associate New York with the feeling of liberation,” Julie says. “There are so many unexpected things that happen every day in New York. Whenever you're walking, you don’t know if you'll see the people you pass ever again. I just think the crowd is a really interesting concept for me–being amongst so many different people yet not knowing who they are.” 

Remembering or holding onto disappearing moments in blue (2019)

Remembering or holding onto disappearing moments in blue (2019) was also a piece that allowed Julie to elevate her creative process. In the piece, Julie and her dad sit in the restaurant The Butcher’s Daughter in West Village. Julie and her dad were never in this restaurant together, but Julie recalled that she imagined this scenario in her head and placed different photo references of her dad, herself, and the restaurant together. She feels that if she’s “just trying to replicate a picture, it becomes hard to be intuitive and fluid with brushstrokes and colors. Having different references and being the one to put it all together into one canvas makes it more natural.”

What these two pieces, along with much of Julie’s work, have in common is the centering of relationships, especially between two people in her life who she loves. When I asked about this theme, she simply stated, “I don't think it's intuitive for me to do anything else in terms of subject matter. The things that I really want to paint are the people I value and experiences I've had.” 

Despite her love for New York, she also wanted to express the loneliness that comes with living in a big city. Julie wants to communicate “how lonely watching a world full of people can be.” Pieces that capture this feeling of immense solitude include Cold Shower (2020), which is a painting of a Furnald bathroom, where she lived her sophomore year. “I think that captures the loneliness I was talking about, but also feeling comfortable in solitude. That's an example of using colors to embody a mood because I would associate blue with cold, but it's also a color I really love.” 

Cold Shower (2020)

However, during the first half of the pandemic, Julie faced a different kind of isolation in her home in suburban New Jersey. Although she felt detached and alienated from creating art, she began contemplating what she felt drawn towards making and consuming media that inspired her. She specifically mentioned the book The Lonely City by Olivia Lange. “It sent me on a trajectory of figuring out what it means to find your identity in a place,” Julie explained. “It really inspired me to think about the city as a character itself.” 

In general, Julie feels very inspired by books, movies, music, and other artists. She describes how she deeply empathizes with characters in books and movies, getting completely looped up in the fictional person’s feelings and narratives. As for her artmaking process, Julie says this ability makes it really easy for her to imagine things that haven't even happened or imagine feelings that she’s never felt before.” 

Another artist Julie feels inspired by is Julie Mehretu, a contemporary American artist, who she saw at an exhibition at the Whitney Museum last spring. Mehretu’s works are large-scale, abstract, and multi-layer landscape pieces. “Her art was life-changing,” Julie enthuses. “It's the opposite of what my paintings look like, but it was still such an immersive experience. Mehretu’s art pulls you in and makes you feel a part of something.” 

Passionate about Mehretu’s work, Julie went on to explain how she wants to make her pieces just as immersive, even if they take a different form. “I want to create not just a scene but an entire environment that penetrates through the edges of the canvas,” Julie describes. “I want people to breathe the same air as the people inside my canvas.”

Julie also cited the film La La Land as an inspiration to her when it came out, causing her art to be influenced by a variety of films. “I just remember thinking, ‘oh my god, this is a love story where things don't end well but it's still so impactful at communicating what love is and can be. That's when I realized relationships can come in all different shapes and sizes and forms.” 

Julie also writes for Copy Magazine, an arts publication she got involved with last summer, where she goes in-depth about her influences and creative process. “I really appreciate the space I have to write about my art because I had never written about my art like that before. Doing that helps me understand what my goals are, how I want to approach certain paintings, and what kind of an artist I want to be,” Julie said. “It also helped tremendously with talking about my art; now, I have words for what I want to convey in my paintings.” 

Along with writing for the magazine, Julie also started writing poetry to go along with some of her pieces, exploring how language and painting interact. When I asked if she would ever share her poetry, she laughed nervously and explained how her writing felt more private. “My words are so much more personal. I'm writing to immediately communicate the thoughts or feelings that are in my head,” she says. “In contrast with paintings, I'm thinking about how I want people to feel when they see it.”

In her paintings, Julie hopes to transcend the physical spaces she depicts, using bright colors and specific color palettes to incite a certain mood. In order to describe what she’s feeling through her art to her viewers, Julie says: “I try to put myself into the zone of the feeling I'm trying to emulate. Sometimes I'll make Spotify playlists to go along with the narrative of the day. It makes a huge difference having the feeling actively in my chest. This way, I can absorb the feeling of the relationship or the person, and I splash it onto the canvas.”

Although many of her pieces include close friends or family, Julie uses her own experience to convey deeper emotions that anyone can relate to. “It would be easy for people to relate and connect more if we were stripped of everything on the outside and just focused on the emotions we feel at our core,” Julie explains. “I think when people are at their most vulnerable state, we're all so similar; most feelings are super universal. I love tying people together through emotions and tapping into that place you don't really share with people on the surface.” 

When asked about her future, Julie has a clear vision for what she wants. “The biggest thing is that I just really want to paint more,” she expresses. Along with considering paths like art education or programming at museums, Julie hopes to produce an expansive collection of pieces and eventually be part of permanent collections in galleries and museums. However, now, she continues to be inspired by young artists she sees online. “Finding artists in their early to mid-career doing well gives me a lot of hope.”

In the past year, Julie feels that she’s made significant progress towards her goals. Along with writing for Copy Magazine, she did an internship for Art on the Ave, a non-profit that places art by underrepresented New York City artists in vacant storefronts. Through the internship, her art was placed in an exhibition in the Financial District, which was her first public show. She was also able to exhibit her art made in class at the Columbia Undergraduate Art Show, which happens at the end of each semester. “I was like, ‘wow, I have made so many things this year,’ and a lot of my friends came out to see it. I think that was a taste of what it would be like to show art at a national gallery or museum in the future,” Julie said. “That felt so great, so that's motivation for how I'll approach my future.”

Art piece that was in the Art on the Ave exhibition - Mom (2019)

Seasick, Homesick (2018)

However, as she exhibits her art more publically, Julie increasingly considers how audiences view her artwork, shifting her creative process. “It’s tough because I know my art still exists without people looking at it but also having an audience is super important. I want people to feel the way that I feel when I watch a movie or when I read a really incredible book.” 

Recently, someone messaged Julie and told her how much her artwork meant to them. “That reinforced for me why I want to paint. It's not that everyone who looks at my pieces has to, but even one person feeling understood or heard or seen feels important to me.” 

You can keep up with Julie Kim’s work on her website and through her Studio Diaries in Copy Magazine. She also sells prints of her work on her Instagram

Beatrix Villiers

Feature by Taylor Bhaiji

Photos by Jasmine Wang

Bea Villers is a digital and animation artist. Using photoshop as her canvas, Bea creates a fantastical world with saturated and contrasting tones that rival the colors we see in our reality. Inspired by the runway that is the city, Bea displays fashion through a whole new window that dresses her imaginative characters.

Go ahead and introduce yourself!

I am Bea Villiers and I am a freshman at Columbia College. I’m also from London.

When was your first encounter with art?

I’ve been basically drawing since I was born. It’s always been something that I didn’t really have to think about, sort of like a safe space. At the end of the day, I can go and relax and get into my art. It’s always been therapeutic for me. 

I also grew up in a very artistic household. My mother is also into art and we went to galleries in London where we lived. It’s a great place to get inspired.


Tell me about the different media you use.

I mainly use digital art, animation, sculpture and oil painting. Digital art and animation kind of intersect because I use Photoshop for both. I do 2D animation, so I can create a single drawing and from there I can create animation. In terms of sculpting, I tend to do figure sculpting with polymer clay. I made a ring collection of necklaces. I also sculpt a lot of faces, like alien faces and fantastical creatures. Oil painting is something I want to explore more. It’s very different from my other styles. 

What prompted your movement into the digital realm of art?

It was actually my neighbor. My neighbor works in animation and concept art. He worked on the film Paddington. For my eleventh birthday he gifted me a Wacom tablet and gave me a free Photoshop download, which allowed me to experiment. It took a long time for me to create art I was proud of. 


Can you talk about how your art has evolved?

My art has gone through a major evolution this summer. Before I was doing a lot of fashion drawings and I was mainly focusing on the clothes. Then, I started experimenting with big scale paintings and using a loose brush stroke style. I started to incorporate my painting style into my digital art, so that it would seem more fluid but still have a digital element. I also moved towards more fantastical themes in my work.

How do you discover your subjects or find your muse?

My characters come from my mind, and I get fashion inspiration from Pinterest. I also get inspiration from my friends, and the way they dress in real life. I like to represent them in my artwork. 

Who or what are your artistic influences?

I am very inspired by Japanese art. Studio Ghibli films are a big inspiration for me with the fantastical elements. I really like the work of Jenny Saville and the way she depicts women, skin, and the female form. 

I am also very interested in Mary Katayama’s art. She’s a disabled artist and she has these very cool photographs where she incorporates fabric appendages. Her color palettes are amazing. 

Have you considered branching out into different mediums of art?

Yes! I really want to get more involved with sewing and clothing design, though I'm really bad at technical things. But, I want to try it out for sure. I’ve also been thinking of branching out into graffiti lately. 


Can you talk about your choice of using bright, neon colors?

When I moved towards creating art that was more fantastical, I wanted to use more interesting and contrasting colors and go outside of the traditional color palette of the human skin. I wanted to incorporate more blues and greens because I started noticing the tones of our skins. On my phone I would turn up the saturation of pictures of myself and my friends, and you can see that there are so many different colors within our skin tone, and I wanted to emphasize that in my work. 

Eye are such a powerful element in your work. Why do you draw them the way you do?

I feel like that’s also definitely inspired by Japanese art. Eyes are so powerful, and I want to exaggerate that because I feel like they are the coolest feature of the human body. I don’t even know if I’m capable of drawing people with normal-sized eyes. I’ve been drawing big eyes since I was little. I guess it’s just a part of my style 

How long does it usually take you to finish a piece?

Sometimes in my mind, I’ll have a vision and I will just do it, and I’ll be done thinking that my art is perfect. Other times, there is a little thing wrong and I am experimenting for hours. Sometimes my art is done fast, but sometimes it can take months.


Fashion seems to play an important role in your artwork. How does living in New York, a fashion capital, play into your work?

Definitely. Having grown up in a big city and moving to another big city, you are exposed to lots of cool people and cool styles that have influenced my outlook. New York fashion and London fashion are interesting, and I love to see the differences. I noticed I’ve been more free with my artwork and more explorative since I’ve gotten here.

If you could describe your art in one word, what would it be?

Maybe “saturated” just because my work is so bright and I use such contrasting tones. I feel like the saturation within my art is such a central part of my work.  

Is Instagram your main mode of sharing your art?

Instagram and TikTok, but I haven’t been active as much lately. I was gaining popularity on Instagram, so I was sticking with the art that was getting a lot of likes, but in a way it felt like posting for my audience was hindering my artistic development. I’ve done that style since I was fifteen and now I’m eighteen, so it’s time to change it up. I don’t feel like the art I post now gets as much support, but I still like it a lot more. Lately, I’ve been trying to focus on creating art for myself rather than for other people.

What are you working on right now? What's next?

I am working on a piece that takes place at a nickel factory in Norilsk that I watched a documentary about. It has Artic climate and is very polluted and isolated. There are these tower blocks there because it used to be a Soviet labor camp. I’m doing a drawing of two characters in a Norilsk cityscape. I feel like it’s different from my usual drawings because it has a very depressing mood and the colors are very gray and unsaturated.

Where else can we find your work?

My TikTok is @beafcakez  and my Instagram is @murpll.